GortonBlue62
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Nov 2015
- Messages
- 3,060
well the fact that they occasionally do modify and reject laws from the Commission rather makes my point. As I said The Commissioners are appointed but have to be ratified by a majority of MEP's ( you know the ones who are elected in the EU elections ).
The Commission is so secret they publish quarterly reports on what they have been dealing with. Proper espionage/conspiracy theory.
Dragging dubious personal dislikes of politicians in and how they progressed through legislatures is pointless. We can trade examples that prove nothing other than politicians do politics.
Its funny that coz when we were in the EU MEP's did assist constituents - even the fuckwit Dorries could see that where we are now leaves us outside the EU looking in following rules with no influence on them.
As ever Brexiteers can never really be specific on EU laws coz they followed the rants of Farage without asking what laws. Interesting you come down on CAP - because famously now we are no longer in it we are giving away our sheep farming and grain farming a veterinary control at the borders in exchange for the cheapest - sorry dearest - food in Europe - Jesus even Lidl trainers are back in store costing £15 when they used to be a tenner - you will need to take that up with Reet-Smug though coz he lied to you about cheap trainers too.
My examples of Kinnock and Mandelson were just that, examples that illustrate the principle of democratic accountability and nothing to do with making a narrow political point.
The daily workings of the House of Commons are freely available for all to see, not in a quarterly report of the one party state that is the EU Commission.
MEPs can not go back to the Commission once EU law is on a member states statute books. Their big chance is before the legislation passes to the Council of Ministers. As I said a Parliament in name only to satisfy EU apologists like you.
The EU makes no claim to be democratic, it was set up to bypass national democracies and openly and frequently makes the point. (Excessive nationalist tendencies that caused the second world war were a result of a lack of democracy not too much - the EU's founding fathers overlooked the fact that Hitler and Mussollini were autocratic dictators unencumbered by having to submit themselves to the inconvenience of an election - people tend not to vote for warmongers - which is why it's rare for two democracies to go to war.).
Very sorry your trainers are a bit more expensive. You clearly have no idea about what's important in a debate of this magnitude and prefer to concentrate on details and completely ignore the big picture; having the vote matters and anything that dilutes the power of that vote should be resisted.