How does booing help?

Prestwich_Blue said:
GaudinoMotors said:
How does booing help?


It helps to identify the knobheads
There were over 30,000 of those there on Saturday then. Because nearly everyone booed that decision to replace Tevez with Barry.

Which is strange since Tevez asked to come off.
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
GaudinoMotors said:
How does booing help?


It helps to identify the knobheads
There were over 30,000 of those there on Saturday then. Because nearly everyone booed that decision to replace Tevez with Barry.

but at that stage, nobody knew if it was a tactical substitution or due to injury, yet they booed anyway.
 
Without fans there would be no club.
The owners, Mancini and the players need to know when the fans aren't happy with the complete bullshit on the pitch. If they play well we will clap and cheer if they shit they will get boo'ed.
They are professional footballers who are getting payed a shit load of money to go out and perform, we are paying alot of money to go and watch them perform. If I dont like what I see and feel like I have wasted money then I'll boo all I like.

If you pay to go to watch a band play and they just stand there moaning instead of singing you would boo would you not? You have payed for a performance and you're not getting one.

We have a brilliant squad, we have a great set up, we have a manager with a brilliant record so if they dont play to level they should be then as fans its up to us to let them know.

Anyone who sais we shouldnt boo clearly dosnt give a shit about how well we play.
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
GaudinoMotors said:
How does booing help?


It helps to identify the knobheads
There were over 30,000 of those there on Saturday then. Because nearly everyone booed that decision to replace Tevez with Barry.


Shows just how big the problem is then - ""30,000"" who didn't analyse what he was doing and why - just decided to boo and have a knee jerk tantrum on an admittedly frustrating afternoon. Thankfully your estimation is way out.
 
Cobwebcat said:
Prestwich_Blue said:
There were over 30,000 of those there on Saturday then. Because nearly everyone booed that decision to replace Tevez with Barry.

Which is strange since Tevez asked to come off.
It was the decision to replace him with Barry, rather than another striker that was booed, not the decision to take him off as such. People could see he was struggling and I think most people knew that Mancini wouldn't take him off without good reason.

If Jo had been brought on there would have been no boos.<br /><br />-- Mon Nov 15, 2010 1:28 pm --<br /><br />
GaudinoMotors said:
Prestwich_Blue said:
There were over 30,000 of those there on Saturday then. Because nearly everyone booed that decision to replace Tevez with Barry.


Shows just how big the problem is then - ""30,000"" who didn't analyse what he was doing and why - just decided to boo and have a knee jerk tantrum on an admittedly frustrating afternoon. Thankfully your estimation is way out.
I don't think so pal.
 
20sbc07 said:
Without fans there would be no club.
The owners, Mancini and the players need to know when the fans aren't happy with the complete bullshit on the pitch. If they play well we will clap and cheer if they shit they will get boo'ed.
They are professional footballers who are getting payed a shit load of money to go out and perform, we are paying alot of money to go and watch them perform. If I dont like what I see and feel like I have wasted money then I'll boo all I like.

If you pay to go to watch a band play and they just stand there moaning instead of singing you would boo would you not? You have payed for a performance and you're not getting one.

We have a brilliant squad, we have a great set up, we have a manager with a brilliant record so if they dont play to level they should be then as fans its up to us to let them know.

Anyone who sais we shouldnt boo clearly dosnt give a shit about how well we play.

What if the band were, on the whole a decent band, but just missed a few note's on the odd occasion, because they had only formed recently?
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
Cobwebcat said:
Which is strange since Tevez asked to come off.
It was the decision to replace him with Barry, rather than another striker that was booed, not the decision to take him off as such. People could see he was struggling and I think most people knew that Mancini wouldn't take him off without good reason.

If Jo had been brought on there would have been no boos.

-- Mon Nov 15, 2010 1:28 pm --

GaudinoMotors said:
Shows just how big the problem is then - ""30,000"" who didn't analyse what he was doing and why - just decided to boo and have a knee jerk tantrum on an admittedly frustrating afternoon. Thankfully your estimation is way out.
I don't think so pal.
It certainly wasn't 'nearly everyone' around me in 109, there were some boos all around but the majority we're clearly from 110/111, you could see people looking at them and shaking their heads.
 
why are people comparing supporting City to eating out or watching a band FFS.
What is wrong with you people?

You really are getting your 'leisure activities' mixed up. If all City is to you is a leisure option or choice and you might just as well go to the pictures or to see a band or for a meal as go and watch City- then we have the answer to your attitudes right there.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.