The perfect fumble
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 24,583
I fully agree the sub delivery date is irrelevant. Upgrading to modern tech and capability isn’t. This isn’t about 12 subs, no one cares - the US could have added them to the region if that was the only objective - it’s about building cooperation, alliances and a message
I certainly don’t think the world wants to fall out with China it just wants it to operate in the frame of international norms. ie China is not a threat to world peace but to world order. The Chinese for their part probably don’t see they are doing much wrong.
Regionally is where we see this manifest. Unfortunately here China isn’t really exerting soft power anymore, it’s not benign and has increased military spending again. They’ve acted with increasing hostility towards their neighbours particularly in relation to the the land grab/island building in territorial waters of others, sure they placate them with loans which dampens the protests but ultimately they are denying those states and those people of income from their untapped resources that now “belong” to China. Further they’ve tried to extend China’s territorial waters by building islands to both increase their resource claims and deny international shipping access. Just because it’s an invasion by money and engineering rather than guns, doesn’t make it less of an invasion. Words aka diplomacy has been tried but China doesn’t listen to the words of the international community and it’s promises aren’t worth a lot, the only thing left is to see if China pays attention to strength. I don’t even “blame” China here, what they are doing makes sense for them - and it’s a novel approach. But unless we are going to rip up world order and go back to the days of conquest of the weak by the rich/powerful and empires then we need to act.
If history has taught us anything then it is doing nothing is usually the worst option of all. Had the allies not shied away from taking more robust steps to kerb Hilters ambitions during the 1930s things may well have turned out differently. We’re nowhere near that here but making China’s stop and take stock of its ambition with strategic alliances seems the most sensible option for now. It’s important to not skew alliance strength too much against China as they will perceive it as unnecessarily aggressive (eg adding Japan to the alliance)
"(China) land grab/island building in territorial waters"
You don't say!
Today, there are more than 400 American military bases around China with missiles, bombers, warships, and nuclear weapons.
Let's just say we disagree and leave it at that.