Yeah right .
You know what I mean.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Huddersfield child sex inquiry
- Thread starter laughing gravy
- Start date
You know what I mean.
Two Gun Bob
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Apr 2010
- Messages
- 12,496
No not happy at all but expect strict release conditions to be met,are you still happy to kill someone who may turn out to be innocent?
OK it's a condition of your release Mr Phile that you are not to go visit any mInors even though your sexuality says you want to commit lots more further acts of pedophilia on them..What do you think they will say Mr Daze ? I guess they may say I am cured now innit !
I would be happy to pull the trapdoor on any rapist that has been conclusively proven by every method know to man to have offended against a minor.An alternative to the long drop could be castration combined with a lengthy prison sentence if the courts found it acceptable.
Last edited:
bluethrunthru
Well-Known Member
Two points
1/ I agree - hard to deport anyone who is a UK citizen
2/ - mods - the accused named were named at committal proceedings. I think 12 had their names with held for legal reasons. For your own sake and that of BM if you think you know their names DO NOT publish it. Second when it goes to trial then like the Yaxley-Lennon situation if the Judge at a Crown Court trial imposes reporting restrictions again don't report anything even the names that are already in the public domain unless you want to get BM in bother. That is enforced until the Judge removes the restrictions too............unless you want to share a cell with Tommy.
1/ I agree - hard to deport anyone who is a UK citizen
2/ - mods - the accused named were named at committal proceedings. I think 12 had their names with held for legal reasons. For your own sake and that of BM if you think you know their names DO NOT publish it. Second when it goes to trial then like the Yaxley-Lennon situation if the Judge at a Crown Court trial imposes reporting restrictions again don't report anything even the names that are already in the public domain unless you want to get BM in bother. That is enforced until the Judge removes the restrictions too............unless you want to share a cell with Tommy.
I'm With Stupid
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 May 2013
- Messages
- 20,540
I think "self-regulation" was exactly the problem in the first place. They need to be regulated by the police, like everyone else in the country, rather than being given a wide berth for fear of accusations of racism.I live in a very multicultural part of East London and you rarely seen an unaccompanied woman at night. South Asian men have come in the pubs on occasions trying to put their hands on white women. They were soon forcibly ejected.
90% of those involved in grooming gangs are of the same origin. It’s intrinsically a problem within their community and they need to self regulate.
I'm With Stupid
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 May 2013
- Messages
- 20,540
Exactly. Their names aren't typically withheld to protect them, they're withheld because they could be used to identify the victims. Same reason we don't usually find out the name of someone who abuses their own kids.Two points
1/ I agree - hard to deport anyone who is a UK citizen
2/ - mods - the accused named were named at committal proceedings. I think 12 had their names with held for legal reasons. For your own sake and that of BM if you think you know their names DO NOT publish it. Second when it goes to trial then like the Yaxley-Lennon situation if the Judge at a Crown Court trial imposes reporting restrictions again don't report anything even the names that are already in the public domain unless you want to get BM in bother. That is enforced until the Judge removes the restrictions too............unless you want to share a cell with Tommy.
goater555
Well-Known Member
Has that MP c@nt Naz commented yet?
I like you.OK it's a condition of your release Mr Phile that you are not to go visit any mInors even though your sexuality says you want to commit lots more further acts of pedophilia on them..What do you think they will say Mr Daze ? I guess they may say I am cured now innit !
I would be happy to pull the trapdoor on any pedophile that has been conclusively proven by every method know to man to have offended against a minor..I would so be happy for surgical castration and a lengthy sentence as an alternative if the courts found it acceptable.
Can I touch your scarf for inspiration ?
peoffrey
Well-Known Member
I think "self-regulation" was exactly the problem in the first place. They need to be regulated by the police, like everyone else in the country, rather than being given a wide berth for fear of accusations of racism.
Reported to the police by their own. I’d shop rapists. People will take the law in to their own hands unless it’s dealt with. Cue a civil war...
Two Gun Bob
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Apr 2010
- Messages
- 12,496
I like you.
Can I touch your scarf for inspiration ?
It's called a Neckerchief Andrew and I only allow hands on at weekends : /
Last edited:
NorthamptonBlue
Well-Known Member
Presumably there's a court press release that they all copy. Or they're all owned by the same company. It's quite common for local newspapers to have identical stories.
Thanks for the three replies. The three newspapers were all national so I guess the first reason is the most likely.