Hughes and his status, from an "insider"

[Kinkys Blue Socks]

someone on another thread said they would be happy to see city lose if it meant MH got sacked....now that is mental!!!

That all depends on how much you love and care for City.... never heared the expression... "got to be cruel to be kind"?

I've tried to ignore your posts but this one takes the fuckin biscuit.

I don't even have to go into why this comment is ridiculous. If you have an ounce of a brain cell you'll already know.

 

[scorer]

That all depends on how much you love and care for City.... never heared the expression... "got to be cruel to be kind"?

I've tried to ignore your posts but this one takes the fuckin biscuit.

I don't even have to go into why this comment is ridiculous. If you have an ounce of a brain cell you'll already know.

Am I correct in assuming you disagree with my views... sorry bout that old chap....

We need rid of Hughes. When we're in the bottom three in February, dont you dare come on here critiscing Hughes and crying about it - you wont be welcome on my bandwagon.

 

[Dr.Faustus]

That is why we need Hughes removed sooner rather than later and to not give him access to the unlimited funds we are supposed to have available.

Hughes is very astute and clever in the transfer market... it's his tactics that baffle me.

 

[Kinkys Blue Socks]

I've tried to ignore your posts but this one takes the fuckin biscuit.

I don't even have to go into why this comment is ridiculous. If you have an ounce of a brain cell you'll already know.

Am I correct in assuming you disagree with my views... sorry bout that old chap....

We need rid of Hughes. When we're in the bottom three in February, dont you dare come on here critiscing Hughes and crying about it - you wont be welcome on my bandwagon.

Before you try and spin my post into some fluffy pro Hughes one (which I am neither pro nor anti at the moment!), lets look at the comment you have just made.

To "be cruel to be kind", you would quite happily see City keep losing if it meant we got rid of Hughes. Now I am all for a bit of balance but the one thing I can't stand in life is illogical and irrational mutterings of a certifiable one-amp, of which you are certainly one.

Trust me, your band wagon is one I don't want to be within 100 yards of. I'll make my decision on Hughes based on reason, results, and only after there has been sufficient time to do so. I will never want City to lose under any circumstances.

You have been spouting off about Hughes before his team had kicked a ball, so don't come now saying you made a balanced decision that he wasn't good enough. If he doesn't make it, well then that's fine, if he does make then you will still find something to go on about him because you're just one of those sorts of fans. You shout louder than all in the bad times, but I note your absence on here when we have a good result.

City are so lucky to have fans like you.

 

[ejohn]

Scorer is spot on with his analysis.

Its a sickening thought, but yes if it ment getting someone in who could work with our gifted and talented squad, then yes loose at WBA and let it happen in front of millions around the globe on SKY.

Let Cook also be seen driving away from COMS on Monday morning with his P45 being chased by the mob. Let him (Cook) understand what it is like to be humiliated. Of course he says he loves the club, in that case lets see if he purchases a season card for the remainder of this season which is rapidly turning into a nightmare of epic proportions.

Keep up your work scorer.

 

[westie]

.

 

[Pam]

There's nothing to gain from sacking Hughes at this stage. The proof of the pudding will be the players he manages to attract (or not attract) in January and then our progress over the second half of the season. I'm pretty annoyed about how things have gone so far and the jury is definitely out when it comes to his man management skills.

 

[Dr.Faustus]

As for Cook did everyone forget about his particular brand of genius; <a class="postlink" href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/football/premier_league/article4592939.ece" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/ ... 592939.ece</a>

“If you could central-entity the top 10 teams to create a global empire called the Premier League, I would sacrifice my own club [Birmingham City] into another division for that. Do Saudi Arabians want to buy
Stoke City? Or do they want to buy Newcastle, Villa, United, City? There are 10 clubs. I’d like not to have promotion and relegation. There’s an emotion around those battles but the dynamics by which fans can get their kicks can change.”

 

[ejohn]

Cook is coming to the end of his time with MCFC (IMO)


The owners must already be considering their options.

 

[zeusbheld]

..

These constant rumours are unstablising the club...its there for all to see....at the game vs everton the crowd were edgy and that affects the players......

ffs don't you think a run of dismal performances might have at least a little bit to do with making the crowd edgy????