You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Hughes going RUMOURS! [Merged]
- Thread starter Rammy Blue
- Start date
blueyorkie
Well-Known Member
DontLookBackInAnger said:fiddlesticksblue said:It still is the first week isn't it???
Sorry what, isn't today the 8th that would make 8 days isn't a week 7 days?
Ermmm to quote Lennon and MacCartney "8 Days a week"
bobmcfc said:not doubting the goat. noooooooooo just saying nothings ever quick easy or pain free at citypatrickblue said:Be fair, he posted it on Tuesday evening and said his source had told him "most probably within the next 48 hours"
That's about now.
Understood PB, but I do feel that we are approaching a point of critical mass considering the rumour and speculation about almost every aspect of the club at the moment, of which much has had negative conotations.
Performances on the pitch have played a big part, but after the euthoria of sept 1st I expect most if not all we're looking ahead to a post xmas/new year excuse to throw off a Power W**k or get bladdered again.
There's 20 odd days left in Jan :-))
Ducado said:rodders said:Another update from the original source.................
------------------------------------------------------------------
goat_thelegend
Post subject: Re: The Thread for "In the know" posts and rumors
PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 6:15 pm
Online
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 7:05 pm
Posts: 1253
Supporter of: city
Im back.
For todays update, it is only a matter of time now and thats all I have.
Must admit I'm getting twitchy myself as this is dragging on ages.
Also I heard that Hughes has recently been on Sky News complaining that none of his targets has been approached. Anybody got a confirmation on that ?
I bet he is getting twitchy, his ITK status hangs by a thread, if Hughes is in charge on Saturday he will be forever known as goat_thewum
You are praying for him to get this one wrong aren't you? Nothing to do with whether you are pro or anti Hughes, you just appear to have this pathetic bee in your bonnet about him.
Get over it and stop embarrassing yourself with whatever crusade it is you have against him or the site that he posts on.
ell
Well-Known Member
I heard Elano and Jo are planning on taking him on a trip to chester zoo... and accidentaly ;) pushing him into the lions.
Im ITK boys, im best mates with the waterboy
Im ITK boys, im best mates with the waterboy
Ducado
Well-Known Member
Blue Sun said:Ducado said:I bet he is getting twitchy, his ITK status hangs by a thread, if Hughes is in charge on Saturday he will be forever known as goat_thewum
You are praying for him to get this one wrong aren't you? Nothing to do with whether you are pro or anti Hughes, you just appear to have this pathetic bee in your bonnet about him.
Get over it and stop embarrassing yourself with whatever crusade it is you have against him or the site that he posts on.
LOL, That's a bit strong, I just do not like the hypocrisy of certain posters on "that site" who say BM is full of Wums and slag BM off all the time
Doesnt stop you from posting there though does it Duckie?
Look if this goat fella is wrong then he's wrong you have liberated yourself from ever having to read his posts. Same with the other site, if you dont like it then save yourself the bother.
Besides I dont believe anything I read unless its "nailed on" by Millsy
Look if this goat fella is wrong then he's wrong you have liberated yourself from ever having to read his posts. Same with the other site, if you dont like it then save yourself the bother.
Besides I dont believe anything I read unless its "nailed on" by Millsy
yea i get the same feeling from that forum,some good posters on there,but some with the heads stuck up their arses.Ducado said:Blue Sun said:You are praying for him to get this one wrong aren't you? Nothing to do with whether you are pro or anti Hughes, you just appear to have this pathetic bee in your bonnet about him.
Get over it and stop embarrassing yourself with whatever crusade it is you have against him or the site that he posts on.
LOL, That's a bit strong, I just do not like the hypocrisy of certain posters on "that site" who say BM is full of Wums and slag BM off all the time
Ducado
Well-Known Member
Well not long now before the 48 hrs is up
Ducado said:Well not long now before the 48 hrs is up
There you go again! You are obsessed!
The 48 hours that he made clear was his opinion and that he attached the word "Guess" to?
Why not just go and post your comments over there?
bluemoonmcfc4ever
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 4 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 155
Its not true lets face it that one was wrong.
Ducado
Well-Known Member
Blue Sun said:Ducado said:Well not long now before the 48 hrs is up
There you go again! You are obsessed!
The 48 hours that he made clear was his opinion and that he attached the word "Guess" to?
Why not just go and post your comments over there?
Not obsessed at all, just making a point
Ducado
Well-Known Member
I see he is still here, another ITK bites the dust
bizzbo
Well-Known Member
i reckon maybe after forest, Sheik Mansour wanted to know what was going on from Khaldoun before letting any transfers proceed, that would fit.
Rammy Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 May 2008
- Messages
- 32,205
to be fair though we have NOT concluded a single piece of transfer business in a full working week - plenty of speculation about who we are in for but nothing signed and sealed. This would still just about fit with the goat's so called transfer embargo.
may still be more to all this than meets the eye, as such.
may still be more to all this than meets the eye, as such.
Jim Tolmie's Underpants
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Jun 2007
- Messages
- 4,631
Rammy Blue said:to be fair though we have NOT concluded a single piece of transfer business in a full working week - plenty of speculation about who we are in for but nothing signed and sealed. This would still just about fit with the goat's so called transfer embargo.
No it doesn't. We've made a firm bid for Santa Cruz which has been rejected.
DontLookBackInAnger
Well-Known Member
Jim Tolmie's Underpants said:Rammy Blue said:to be fair though we have NOT concluded a single piece of transfer business in a full working week - plenty of speculation about who we are in for but nothing signed and sealed. This would still just about fit with the goat's so called transfer embargo.
No it doesn't. We've made a firm bid for Santa Cruz which has been rejected.
Do we know that the bid was this week(perhaps it was the end of last week)?
Blackburn said on their website:
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.rovers.premiumtv.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10303~1512366,00.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.rovers.premiumtv.co.uk/page/ ... 66,00.html</a>
on THURSDAY that a bid for RSC had been received, but then rejected. I'm sure I heard Tuesday or Wednesday from Blackburn that they hadn't received a bid for RSC yet. So I'd say that it was Thursday we put the bid in.
Bear in mind the rumours that Hughes told Aldridge and Cook on Saturday after the game that he needed new players ASAP, seems a bit odd to me. Surely RSC is Hughes main target (if only for 'sentimental' or physcological reasons for Hughes). Very strange that we wait that long to put a bid in. Especially as we knew the starting block, as we put a bid of £12m for him in the summer didn't we? So we knew Blackburn would want more than that.
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.rovers.premiumtv.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10303~1512366,00.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.rovers.premiumtv.co.uk/page/ ... 66,00.html</a>
on THURSDAY that a bid for RSC had been received, but then rejected. I'm sure I heard Tuesday or Wednesday from Blackburn that they hadn't received a bid for RSC yet. So I'd say that it was Thursday we put the bid in.
Bear in mind the rumours that Hughes told Aldridge and Cook on Saturday after the game that he needed new players ASAP, seems a bit odd to me. Surely RSC is Hughes main target (if only for 'sentimental' or physcological reasons for Hughes). Very strange that we wait that long to put a bid in. Especially as we knew the starting block, as we put a bid of £12m for him in the summer didn't we? So we knew Blackburn would want more than that.
Brucie Bonus
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Aug 2008
- Messages
- 5,215
scall1 said:Blackburn said on their website:
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.rovers.premiumtv.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10303~1512366,00.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.rovers.premiumtv.co.uk/page/ ... 66,00.html</a>
on THURSDAY that a bid for RSC had been received, but then rejected. I'm sure I heard Tuesday or Wednesday from Blackburn that they hadn't received a bid for RSC yet. So I'd say that it was Thursday we put the bid in.
Bear in mind the rumours that Hughes told Aldridge and Cook on Saturday after the game that he needed new players ASAP, seems a bit odd to me. Surely RSC is Hughes main target (if only for 'sentimental' or physcological reasons for Hughes). Very strange that we wait that long to put a bid in. Especially as we knew the starting block, as we put a bid of £12m for him in the summer didn't we? So we knew Blackburn would want more than that.
I'm sure someone is in control. The last few days / weeks / months just look like a cluster fuck.