bluemoonmcfc4ever
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 4 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 155
Its not true lets face it that one was wrong.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Hughes going RUMOURS! [Merged]
- Thread starter Rammy Blue
- Start date
Ducado
Well-Known Member
Blue Sun said:Ducado said:Well not long now before the 48 hrs is up
There you go again! You are obsessed!
The 48 hours that he made clear was his opinion and that he attached the word "Guess" to?
Why not just go and post your comments over there?
Not obsessed at all, just making a point
Ducado
Well-Known Member
I see he is still here, another ITK bites the dust
bizzbo
Well-Known Member
i reckon maybe after forest, Sheik Mansour wanted to know what was going on from Khaldoun before letting any transfers proceed, that would fit.
Rammy Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 May 2008
- Messages
- 30,270
to be fair though we have NOT concluded a single piece of transfer business in a full working week - plenty of speculation about who we are in for but nothing signed and sealed. This would still just about fit with the goat's so called transfer embargo.
may still be more to all this than meets the eye, as such.
may still be more to all this than meets the eye, as such.
Jim Tolmie's Underpants
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Jun 2007
- Messages
- 4,364
Rammy Blue said:to be fair though we have NOT concluded a single piece of transfer business in a full working week - plenty of speculation about who we are in for but nothing signed and sealed. This would still just about fit with the goat's so called transfer embargo.
No it doesn't. We've made a firm bid for Santa Cruz which has been rejected.
DontLookBackInAnger
Well-Known Member
Jim Tolmie's Underpants said:Rammy Blue said:to be fair though we have NOT concluded a single piece of transfer business in a full working week - plenty of speculation about who we are in for but nothing signed and sealed. This would still just about fit with the goat's so called transfer embargo.
No it doesn't. We've made a firm bid for Santa Cruz which has been rejected.
Do we know that the bid was this week(perhaps it was the end of last week)?
Blackburn said on their website:
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.rovers.premiumtv.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10303~1512366,00.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.rovers.premiumtv.co.uk/page/ ... 66,00.html</a>
on THURSDAY that a bid for RSC had been received, but then rejected. I'm sure I heard Tuesday or Wednesday from Blackburn that they hadn't received a bid for RSC yet. So I'd say that it was Thursday we put the bid in.
Bear in mind the rumours that Hughes told Aldridge and Cook on Saturday after the game that he needed new players ASAP, seems a bit odd to me. Surely RSC is Hughes main target (if only for 'sentimental' or physcological reasons for Hughes). Very strange that we wait that long to put a bid in. Especially as we knew the starting block, as we put a bid of £12m for him in the summer didn't we? So we knew Blackburn would want more than that.
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.rovers.premiumtv.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10303~1512366,00.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.rovers.premiumtv.co.uk/page/ ... 66,00.html</a>
on THURSDAY that a bid for RSC had been received, but then rejected. I'm sure I heard Tuesday or Wednesday from Blackburn that they hadn't received a bid for RSC yet. So I'd say that it was Thursday we put the bid in.
Bear in mind the rumours that Hughes told Aldridge and Cook on Saturday after the game that he needed new players ASAP, seems a bit odd to me. Surely RSC is Hughes main target (if only for 'sentimental' or physcological reasons for Hughes). Very strange that we wait that long to put a bid in. Especially as we knew the starting block, as we put a bid of £12m for him in the summer didn't we? So we knew Blackburn would want more than that.
Brucie Bonus
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Aug 2008
- Messages
- 5,215
scall1 said:Blackburn said on their website:
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.rovers.premiumtv.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10303~1512366,00.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.rovers.premiumtv.co.uk/page/ ... 66,00.html</a>
on THURSDAY that a bid for RSC had been received, but then rejected. I'm sure I heard Tuesday or Wednesday from Blackburn that they hadn't received a bid for RSC yet. So I'd say that it was Thursday we put the bid in.
Bear in mind the rumours that Hughes told Aldridge and Cook on Saturday after the game that he needed new players ASAP, seems a bit odd to me. Surely RSC is Hughes main target (if only for 'sentimental' or physcological reasons for Hughes). Very strange that we wait that long to put a bid in. Especially as we knew the starting block, as we put a bid of £12m for him in the summer didn't we? So we knew Blackburn would want more than that.
I'm sure someone is in control. The last few days / weeks / months just look like a cluster fuck.