twinkletoes
Well-Known Member
Matty said:twinkletoes said:Matty said:No, they won't.twinkletoes said:All the doom mongers will have changed their fickle minds around 2nd January.
You could shave a chimp, put him in a suit, hand him a banana and call him the gaffer and we'd still improve our performances from January onwards. If we spend the sums of money being quoted, on the kinds of players we're being linked to it wouldn't matter who was in charge, we'd improve. The question is, why should it be Hughes who gets to peel the banana? On this seasons performances he should stick to moving pianos up and down stairs.
So what is your point? Your argument means we should stick with Hughes!
No, it doesn't. It only means that if you haven't understood it.
ANYONE would improve us in January. Hughes or someone else, it's irrelevant. What Hughes has proven is that, so far, he's incapable of getting the performances out of our current players that they are capable of. In the New Year we'll improve because the players are better, but under Hughes there's every chance they STILL not reach the levels they're capable of. So, BETTER than so far but not as good as they could do, kind of the same as the chimp would manage. We need a manager that can get the best from his players.
So when Steven Ireland says he is the best manager he has ever worked under, that's what you mean?