1) As a number of posters have said a testimonial was something that was done in days gone by when a player needed som support as they were about to leave the only profession thay knew at the ag of 30-40. Now they have been paid ludicrously well and should have been able to manage their own finances.
2) Richard Dunne was a great player for City. He was poor last season and his time had come. We needed better CHs and the manager has brought players he thinks fit the bill (others may disagree that they are bteer but at the end of the day MH picks the team not us).
3) Loyalty? the club has shown great loyalty to RD. Keegan couldn't have got rid. He didn't and stuck by him. The club were then rewarded with loyalty and good performances. Everyone was a winner. In all honesty i thin it is always very difficult for a club to show loyalty to players who have been great but go past their sellby. WHU could be said to treat Bobby Moore poorly, Utd treated Beckham, Staam etc possrly, City treated Buzzer, lee etc poorly, the list goes on and on. What can they do when they feel a player is no longer needed. it is just a fgact of life.
4) Footballers and the press - most of the issue that is created is down to footballers gobbing it. In what other profession do you get this? We have had Elano using the press and now Dunne. I have been disappointed by both. They may well have a grievance by why the need to air it in public. I left a company I founded amicably in 2006. I signed a compromise agreement that specifically stoppped me from bad mouthing the company. i think this should be done with footabllers who are not always the brightest and who invariably have mixed emotions when they have been sold.
Dunne has been a good servant. I would applaud him greatly on his return. He is a twat however, to cry to the press. he was also a porr captian IMO.