Hughes to joke city

I thought Pulis got the sack for signing ageing players on high wages?

<a class="postlink" href="http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11701/9196995/transfer-news-ivica-olic-reveals-joining-stoke-is-his-preference-this-summer" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www1.skysports.com/football/news ... his-summer</a>



Wouldn't surprise me if he signed Bellemy in the summer.
 
Kun Aguero said:
I thought Pulis got the sack for signing ageing players on high wages?

<a class="postlink" href="http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11701/9196995/transfer-news-ivica-olic-reveals-joining-stoke-is-his-preference-this-summer" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www1.skysports.com/football/news ... his-summer</a>



Wouldn't surprise me if he signed Bellemy in the summer.

Didn't Bellers recently say that he'd probably retire if Cardiff stay up?

In other words, his days in the PL are numbered.
 
Reading some of the previous posts on here shows me how ignorant some City "fans" can be. He's done a good job at Stoke with home wins over Liverpool and Chelsea so far. Pulis' next spend was really high whilst the transfer market has always been a positive for Hughes. He's got an eye for talent on a budget. Look at Blackburn, QPR and Fulham now. Not Hughes' fault.
 
peoffrey said:
Reading some of the previous posts on here shows me how ignorant some City "fans" can be. He's done a good job at Stoke with home wins over Liverpool and Chelsea so far. Pulis' next spend was really high whilst the transfer market has always been a positive for Hughes. He's got an eye for talent on a budget. Look at Blackburn, QPR and Fulham now. Not Hughes' fault.
Not sure if a Clarkie or not.
 
Kun Aguero said:
peoffrey said:
Reading some of the previous posts on here shows me how ignorant some City "fans" can be. He's done a good job at Stoke with home wins over Liverpool and Chelsea so far. Pulis' next spend was really high whilst the transfer market has always been a positive for Hughes. He's got an eye for talent on a budget. Look at Blackburn, QPR and Fulham now. Not Hughes' fault.
Not sure if a Clarkie or not.
QPR was definitely at least 50% of Agent Hughes' fault.
 
peoffrey said:
Reading some of the previous posts on here shows me how ignorant some City "fans" can be. He's done a good job at Stoke with home wins over Liverpool and Chelsea so far. Pulis' next spend was really high whilst the transfer market has always been a positive for Hughes. He's got an eye for talent on a budget. Look at Blackburn, QPR and Fulham now. Not Hughes' fault.
He's very good in the market on a restricted budget.

With cash to burn he's fucking useless.
 
BlueTG said:
Kun Aguero said:
peoffrey said:
Reading some of the previous posts on here shows me how ignorant some City "fans" can be. He's done a good job at Stoke with home wins over Liverpool and Chelsea so far. Pulis' next spend was really high whilst the transfer market has always been a positive for Hughes. He's got an eye for talent on a budget. Look at Blackburn, QPR and Fulham now. Not Hughes' fault.
Not sure if a Clarkie or not.
QPR was definitely at least 50% of Agent Hughes' fault.

And the rest, we should have punted him on the day of the takeover.
 
Got to hand it too him, made some really good signings in Bardsley and Mama Diouf, also in talks with Emmanuel River and strongly linked to Sidwell and Seb Larrson.

Begovic
Bardsley Shawcross Huth Peters
Adam Nzonzi
Armathingy Diouf Rivers Odemcarpark
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.