gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
Wonder how long it will take for him to comment on their players' fitness levels?
gordondaviesmoustache said:Wonder how long it will take for him to comment on their players' fitness levels?
Fair play to that man, he's got the right idea.uweuweuwe said:Taken from the BBC breaking sports news.
I thought blue moon was bad
they have a picture of his Hillbilly truck on bbc <a class="postlink" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/22698812" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/22698812</a> (go to 17:39)
A Stoke City supporter stages his own protest against Mark Hughes' expected managerial appointment even before it has been made.
Carl, a season ticket-holder who did not want to give his surname, drove around Stoke on Tuesday with banner calling for "Hughes out", which cost him £50.
He said: "It is not just me, it is the thoughts of 90% of Stoke fans. Security made me move on from the Britannia so I drove around. I parked on motorway bridges and people were beeping their support at me and taking photos. He is not a long-term appointment but it looks as though he is going to be appointed anyway.
worsleyweb said:He is a cliche manager. Thinks he is better than he is. Is incredibly greedy. He will no doubt start talking about making the training ground fit for purpose. I honestly think stoke will go down if he comes in. Just out of interest what sort of salary will he be on?
uweuweuwe said:Taken from the BBC breaking sports news.
I thought blue moon was bad
they have a picture of his Hillbilly truck on bbc <a class="postlink" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/22698812" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/22698812</a> (go to 17:39)
A Stoke City supporter stages his own protest against Mark Hughes' expected managerial appointment even before it has been made.
Carl, a season ticket-holder who did not want to give his surname, drove around Stoke on Tuesday with banner calling for "Hughes out", which cost him £50.He said: "It is not just me, it is the thoughts of 90% of Stoke fans. Security made me move on from the Britannia so I drove around. I parked on motorway bridges and people were beeping their support at me and taking photos. He is not a long-term appointment but it looks as though he is going to be appointed anyway.
jimharri said:So then; why don't those other managers get the same amount of stick then? And re. the money. I was merely pointing out the hypocrisy on here. When other managers/clubs mention the amount of money we've spent, this place goes ballistic. Yet that same money is used as a stick to beat Hughes with.stony said:jimharri said:The obsession with him on here is staggering really. Ball was far worse as a manager, as was Clark, as was Frizzell, as was Neal etc etc. Indeed, google Manchester City managers and look at the win percentages of our managers; Hughes is nowhere near the bottom of the list. Yes, I'm sure his critics on here will point to the fact that he had a boat load of money at his disposal. Yet when the media point out the money we've spent, there is uproar on here. Weird. As I said there are a long list of ex managers who were worse than Hughes, yet they don't get a fraction of the abuse he gets on here. He took the team as far as he was able to take them, and time has proved the decision to remove him as the right one (handled appallingly at the time though, same as the Mancini sacking). He's been gone three and a half years now; time to move on.
You say it as though it's neither here nor there. We're only just getting shut of his worst mistakes now.
Of course there have been worse managers than Hughes. It doesn't change the fact that he was fucking useless and since getting sacked from here he's shown just how useless he is.