PJMCC1UK
Well-Known Member
What's the problem? They've only dropped AFC, something no one used anyway.
Is it any different than our name change, or that of Birmingham and all the others.
After 100 years it will just be another part of the clubs history. It is still Hull City. The tigers is still part of their identity. And hardly like they have any real ties to tigers in the first place but that lack of tradition doesn't bother them.
If they dropped Hull, to become Tigers FC, I could see the problem.
What happened with Wimbledon/MK Dons hasn't really changed anything. What they and Cardiff did are far worse but it hasn't created a precedent for all clubs. And I doubt this will either.
In the long run it may work as an appeal with foreign fans. and we'd be silly to think that football hasn't become about maximising foreign income.
Is it any different than our name change, or that of Birmingham and all the others.
After 100 years it will just be another part of the clubs history. It is still Hull City. The tigers is still part of their identity. And hardly like they have any real ties to tigers in the first place but that lack of tradition doesn't bother them.
If they dropped Hull, to become Tigers FC, I could see the problem.
What happened with Wimbledon/MK Dons hasn't really changed anything. What they and Cardiff did are far worse but it hasn't created a precedent for all clubs. And I doubt this will either.
In the long run it may work as an appeal with foreign fans. and we'd be silly to think that football hasn't become about maximising foreign income.