D
D
Deleted member 77198
Guest
Top that!
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Huw Edwards - 6 month suspended sentence (pg 107)
- Thread starter Ric
- Start date
Top that!
D
D
Deleted member 77198
Guest
Shouldn’t be. If he’s done nowt wrong why should it be?His career is over what ever happens.
If anything maybe he can start presenting some other things other than the News while this blows over? But he shouldn’t lose his career and could maybe come back to the News after all this dies down.
johnnytapia
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Feb 2012
- Messages
- 10,578
“Let’s hope all your doughnuts turn out like Fanny’s”Shades of Frank Bough with what's happening with this fella now.
He's seriously fucked his life up.
I hope he doesn't have a long history of abusing lads.
journolud
Well-Known Member
Bravo Jonathan Pie
Not really in a position to listen to it, what’s his take?
Whilst there may be no criminal offences involved, it’s not regarded as ‘normal‘ behaviour.
There are those saying because Edwards presents as such a straight up wholesome chap on the screen, that somehow he should be treated differently.
it would be naive to believe a TV personna is how celebrities are away from the screen. Extreme Example;
No one believed Seville could be guilty either.
if what Edwards has done was ‘normal behaviour’ there wouldn’t be such a farore about it. Some things are just socially unacceptable, and paying a 17yr old when you yourself are in your 60’s for indecent photos is, and should be one of those, in my opinion .
There surely can’t be many parents who’d think that’d be ok for theirs either……
There are those saying because Edwards presents as such a straight up wholesome chap on the screen, that somehow he should be treated differently.
it would be naive to believe a TV personna is how celebrities are away from the screen. Extreme Example;
No one believed Seville could be guilty either.
if what Edwards has done was ‘normal behaviour’ there wouldn’t be such a farore about it. Some things are just socially unacceptable, and paying a 17yr old when you yourself are in your 60’s for indecent photos is, and should be one of those, in my opinion .
There surely can’t be many parents who’d think that’d be ok for theirs either……
meltonblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 14 May 2013
- Messages
- 7,010
meltonblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 14 May 2013
- Messages
- 7,010
Whilst there may be no criminal offences involved, it’s not regarded as ‘normal‘ behaviour.
There are those saying because Edwards presents as such a straight up wholesome chap on the screen, that somehow he should be treated differently.
it would be naive to believe a TV personna is how celebrities are away from the screen. Extreme Example;
No one believed Seville could be guilty either.
if what Edwards has done was ‘normal behaviour’ there wouldn’t be such a farore about it. Some things are just socially unacceptable, and paying a 17yr old when you yourself are in your 60’s for indecent photos is, and should be one of those, in my opinion .
There surely can’t be many parents who’d think that’d be ok for theirs either……
This to me is why the Sun may still have an issue with a defamation case, seems the narrative he paid a 17 yr old has properly landed with a lot of people…
west didsblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Oct 2011
- Messages
- 32,307
Assuming he recovers from his mental health issues and there are no further revelations I think he’ll be back doing HIGNFY or similar in a few months and back on the 10 o’clock news within a year.Shouldn’t be. If he’s done nowt wrong why should it be?
If anything maybe he can start presenting some other things other than the News while this blows over? But he shouldn’t lose his career and could maybe come back to the News after all this dies down.
johnnytapia
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Feb 2012
- Messages
- 10,578
Parents of a 60 yr old are likely to have dementia so I reckon you’d be okay.Whilst there may be no criminal offences involved, it’s not regarded as ‘normal‘ behaviour.
There are those saying because Edwards presents as such a straight up wholesome chap on the screen, that somehow he should be treated differently.
it would be naive to believe a TV personna is how celebrities are away from the screen. Extreme Example;
No one believed Seville could be guilty either.
if what Edwards has done was ‘normal behaviour’ there wouldn’t be such a farore about it. Some things are just socially unacceptable, and paying a 17yr old when you yourself are in your 60’s for indecent photos is, and should be one of those, in my opinion .
There surely can’t be many parents who’d think that’d be ok for theirs either……
Mr Kobayashi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Oct 2020
- Messages
- 17,067
What hospital admissions are you referring to? There is nothing to suggest he has ever been previously admitted to hospital for mental health.
As I said it's a likelihood. He has been open about his severe depression, it's unlikely this would be his first admission. Do you think it's more likely he's in an NHS or NHS contracted bed or a private hospital?