I know for a fact that city are signing Peter Crouch

I hope we don't get him. Fair enough, he seems to have the knack of scoring for England but 51 Premier League goals in 184 appearances isn't that good a record.

Besides, he looks funny.
 
good player, but not outstanding (which is what we should be aiming for ).
if anything crouch should have been signed in january after crcoky santa cruz bid failed. that was a no brainer for me.
but not now we should be aiming higher, and we probabaly are
 
If we're in for Dzeko, I doubt we'd even be looking at Crouch (unless he's a plan B to look at if we don't land Edin). Plus, he'd hardly come to us for impact purposes and/or wages when you take into account Pompey's new owners and the fact he'll probably be the preferred striker there.
 
No he's truly not very good. If he was good he would be at a better club than Pompey. IF we are looking to break into the top season and win something next season playing him upfront will not help. Im sure people would rather have Tevez and Eto.
 
djelanomcfc said:
No he's truly not very good. If he was good he would be at a better club than Pompey. IF we are looking to break into the top season and win something next season playing him upfront will not help. Im sure people would rather have Tevez and Eto.

I'd rather have Kaka and Messi, doesn't mean it is going to happen, does it?
 
indecentKompany said:
Brucie Bonus said:
indecentKompany said:
not my fault! said:
Why after the England games? We didnt wait with Barry..

Because Barry wasn't stuck in Kazakfuckingstan when they agreed the deal.
Crouch is where, doing what?

In Kazaksthan playing for England....

So if he there how was the deal sorted!
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.