Ian Cheeseman (and his VLOGs)

[gordondaviesmoustache]

The BBC are wankstains.

 

[oakiecokie]

I don't think they've even got a drawer opened at the BBC Oakie.... never mind the doors of the cupboard !

IMO there is probably still more "brush under the carpets" sad stories to come out of this organisation.

 

[oakiecokie]

The BBC are wankstains.

Hardly the most appropriate wordings under the circumstances mate. ;)

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Hardly the most appropriate wordings under the circumstances mate. ;)

I am prohibited from posting my word of choice in unredacted form on this particular forum, lamentably.

 

[oakiecokie]

I am prohibited from posting my word of choice in unredacted form on this particular forum, lamentably.

I thought we could say "****s,****s and more ****s" on this thread. ;)

 

[Neville Kneville]

That's unbelievable.

How the fuck can they get away with that ?

Jimmy Saville gets his own show surrounded by kids & nobody at the BBC says fuck all for 40 years but someone blowing the whistle on these monsters get's taken off air in case he says the wrong thing ?!!

So after all the cover ups in the past, we can see where the priorities still lie at the BBC.

 

[1.618034]

Disgusting treatment of Whitey. Just when he needs some support.

 

[I'm no cynic but...]

No. David White is very pissed off at being dropped from commentary. He's not been ordered to do anything.

And the BBC have been slagged off in Parliament for doing so:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/sp...g-David-White-Manchester-City-commentary.html

This article is dated 16th December and is thus nearly two weeks on. There is still a possibility that David has been interviewed in the intervening period. Although every suspicion can be laid towards the BBC, we still can't come to definite conclusions until it goes to court. The BBC say, according to this article, that they acted under legal advice and I'll leave it at that until the next installment.

 

[SWP's back]

This article is dated 16th December and is thus nearly two weeks on. There is still a possibility that David has been interviewed in the intervening period. Although every suspicion can be laid towards the BBC, we still can't come to definite conclusions until it goes to court. The BBC say, according to this article, that they acted under legal advice and I'll leave it at that until the next installment.

And I trust White when he says he could have managed a commentary without mentioning so if it's ok with you, I'll stick with David White.

Either way, your original post said he may have been ordered to keep silent and so you obviously were not been aware of the story when it broke nor did you read David White's opinion on losing his co-commentary job.

 

[Mike N]

So is Cheeseman back for the game tomorrow?