Ibrahimovic

doomuk said:
BlueJill said:
80s Shorts said:
He also said that his original post was nothin to do with the management situation. Then changed his mind later.

Another flat out lie. He never said that.
Yes he did. But magically the thread has dissapeared along with the evidence.
Are you Bombo in disguise?

It was Glen who said it. Are you moron in disguise?
 
forevermancity said:
Mancio said:
forevermancity said:
Imbra would be interesting, a player I always compare with ade, all the ability in the world, but a mard and sometimes half hearted.


compare ibra with ade is blasphemy
Why so?


becouse ibra is all that ade is NOT.

a definitely winner. a leader both on the pitch and in the dressing room. an iper_gifted and very intelligent player. a second striker able to give assist as much as score. an almost umbeatable ball holder . all that ade is NOT
 
BlueJill said:
Cobwebcat said:
So he put his neck on the line and came back and explained. That's all great...does it matter that both pieces of info were wrong or not? For me yes though I appreciate for others that the forum is for rumours too and it would be a rubbish place to be without them. Entertaining yes. ITK no.

As many ITK's have stated, he was in fact right about the first part (Bobby leaving). But things changed.

So right and then wrong about part one and then wrong about part two. Not great is it?
 
Cobwebcat said:
BlueJill said:
Cobwebcat said:
So he put his neck on the line and came back and explained. That's all great...does it matter that both pieces of info were wrong or not? For me yes though I appreciate for others that the forum is for rumours too and it would be a rubbish place to be without them. Entertaining yes. ITK no.

As many ITK's have stated, he was in fact right about the first part (Bobby leaving). But things changed.

So right and then wrong about part one and then wrong about part two. Not great is it?

Agreed. In fact can anyone find anything at all that Bombo has piped up with that has been right? All 2500ish of his WUMing posts!
Even his random guesses are wrong.
 
Mancio said:
forevermancity said:
Mancio said:
compare ibra with ade is blasphemy
Why so?


becouse ibra is all that ade is NOT.

a definitely winner. a leader both on the pitch and in the dressing room. an iper_gifted and very intelligent player. a second striker able to give assist as much as score. an almost umbeatable ball holder . all that ade is NOT


So why didnt he succeed at Barcelona?
 
Cobwebcat said:
BlueJill said:
Cobwebcat said:
So he put his neck on the line and came back and explained. That's all great...does it matter that both pieces of info were wrong or not? For me yes though I appreciate for others that the forum is for rumours too and it would be a rubbish place to be without them. Entertaining yes. ITK no.

As many ITK's have stated, he was in fact right about the first part (Bobby leaving). But things changed.

So right and then wrong about part one and then wrong about part two. Not great is it?

Nearly ALL ITK knowledge is subject to change. That's the way it works. Things change. Tolmie has said that Sanchez was all but ours. Now the media is saying we have given up on him. Who knows if we really have or not. But if he does in fact go elsewhere does that mean Tolmie's info was wrong? If ITK's have to wait until the ink is in fact dry then there wouldn't be a need for them; we would just have to check the OS every day.
 
twinkletoes said:
Mancio said:
forevermancity said:


becouse ibra is all that ade is NOT.

a definitely winner. a leader both on the pitch and in the dressing room. an iper_gifted and very intelligent player. a second striker able to give assist as much as score. an almost umbeatable ball holder . all that ade is NOT


So why didnt he succeed at Barcelona?

why were eto'o or yaya toure forced out from barca ? i dont know , and you ?
 
BlueJill said:
Cobwebcat said:
BlueJill said:
As many ITK's have stated, he was in fact right about the first part (Bobby leaving). But things changed.

So right and then wrong about part one and then wrong about part two. Not great is it?

Nearly ALL ITK knowledge is subject to change. That's the way it works. Things change. Tolmie has said that Sanchez was all but ours. Now the media is saying we have given up on him. Who knows if we really have or not. But if he does in fact go elsewhere does that mean Tolmie's info was wrong? If ITK's have to wait until the ink is in fact dry then there wouldn't be a need for them; we would just have to check the OS every day.


I agree with that up to a point but likewise if an ITK is correct then he has passed on info that was ITK and is lauded but if he was wrong then well "things change" so by that criteria everyone could be ITK as you could never lose.

Occasionally things happen that the press hasn't got hold of and they turn out to be correct. Very particular things like Stuart Taylor signing and he did. A person that posts such info obviously knows what he is talking about and can be forgiven a "things change" sceanario in the future because of course they do.

However, I'm not aware that Bombo has ever done this (as I've seen Tolmie do occasionaly between his youtube madness!) so I have to think maybe he knows no more than I do.

The imfamous Desert Rat (one post and gone) and Spursmad would also fall into this category who have proven they know stuff but can't be expected to get everything correct.
 
twinkletoes said:
Mancio said:
forevermancity said:


becouse ibra is all that ade is NOT.

a definitely winner. a leader both on the pitch and in the dressing room. an iper_gifted and very intelligent player. a second striker able to give assist as much as score. an almost umbeatable ball holder . all that ade is NOT


So why didnt he succeed at Barcelona?

From my point of view, scoring 22 goals and assisting 11 in 40 games is a success (and is about the same as villa has done), and he adapted to a new lague etc. Furthermore he scored some absolutely vital goals (RM home, Stuttgart away, Arsenal away)
 
Ibra is a brilliant footballer and has been whereever he's gone (yes, even Barca - however, he didn't suit their unique style fully so was offloaded despite an excellent goalscoring record). But my main concern is he has struggled somewhat against English clubs in the Champions League, even Spurs with their middle-of-the-line defence, and I'm not sure if that indicates he would struggle in England or what.

But I'll believe it when I see it too. I've read from our apparent #1 ITK on here that Sanchez was basically done and dusted, yet its come out that we haven't even made a bid for him and he is close to Inter.
 
twinkletoes said:
Mancio said:
forevermancity said:


becouse ibra is all that ade is NOT.

a definitely winner. a leader both on the pitch and in the dressing room. an iper_gifted and very intelligent player. a second striker able to give assist as much as score. an almost umbeatable ball holder . all that ade is NOT


So why didnt he succeed at Barcelona?


LOL..You might have seen a certain Messi playing in that position perhaps?
 
BlueJill said:
Plain Speaking said:
BlueJill said:
Bombo made some statements. They turned out not to materialize. He was man enough to come back afterwards and say exactly in no uncertain terms what he meant. People continue to pretend that he said things he didn't say. I just want the record set right.

As for predicting the Jose link...I thought it was pretty obvious.

As for me being Bombo...you decide for yourself :-)))
Fair enough. I appreciate you coming clean ;-).
I suppose it can be handy having two user names I might start a second for myself....err sorry, a friend?
Your (BlueJill's) explanation about the 1936 Spanish civil war leading to Mourinho link seemed more plausible than the "Bombo"s later explanation :-))

Thats the one thing I still don't know for sure. Whether I was right about the Civil War explanation. Bombo's explanation about abdicating the throne was pretty solid I thought. What I really want to know is whether the clue had a double meaning (Abdicating the throne AND the Civil War). If it did, that is one damn fine clue. Bombo, care to weigh in on this point?
Unfortunately your exact words interpreting the "1936" clue have now been deleted, however "1936" is historically most famous for being the start of the "Spanish civil war" and there was a "Real" disagreement at Madrid which Jose now seems to have won. If it wasnt for the recent "King's Speech" most people would not know when the King abdicated. The "abdication" theme did not really fit either with hindsight because Mancini it seems would have had to have been "pushed" rather than jumping ship/abdicating because it seems he was happy to stay? (I realise positions change with different circumstances).
 
twinkletoes said:
So why didnt he succeed at Barcelona?
A couple of months ago I watched David Villa on TV confirm that, BEFORE he signed for them, Barcelona said "You do realise that everything revolves around Messi!". He was happy to sign anyway. The fact that some other player - Ibra - does not fit into a style of play where everything revolves around some other player does not imply anything about the former's ability.

This interview with Villa led me to discount entirely the possibility of Barcelona considering buying Carlos.
 
AC Milan are very smart if they dont sign him permanently. And we are stupid if we sign him....thats the truth.

Anyways..im sure Cook and others will stop Mancini if he even think about this.

This doesn't make sense and i think Bombo is full of shit. I dont believe anything what he says.

Why give this thread some more posts? Just ignore the thread! :D
 
Dzeko and Ibra with Tevez in the hole behind them. A 6' 5" and 6' 4" CF pair - lol, take that Stoke :p
 
Aside from the fact that the OP is full of shit......How about a 12 month loan deal with option to buy. They seem to be all the craze these days.
 
Cobwebcat said:
BlueJill said:
Cobwebcat said:
So right and then wrong about part one and then wrong about part two. Not great is it?

Nearly ALL ITK knowledge is subject to change. That's the way it works. Things change. Tolmie has said that Sanchez was all but ours. Now the media is saying we have given up on him. Who knows if we really have or not. But if he does in fact go elsewhere does that mean Tolmie's info was wrong? If ITK's have to wait until the ink is in fact dry then there wouldn't be a need for them; we would just have to check the OS every day.

I agree with that up to a point but likewise if an ITK is correct then he has passed on info that was ITK and is lauded but if he was wrong then well "things change" so by that criteria everyone could be ITK as you could never lose.

Occasionally things happen that the press hasn't got hold of and they turn out to be correct. Very particular things like Stuart Taylor signing and he did. A person that posts such info obviously knows what he is talking about and can be forgiven a "things change" sceanario in the future because of course they do.

However, I'm not aware that Bombo has ever done this (as I've seen Tolmie do occasionaly between his youtube madness!) so I have to think maybe he knows no more than I do.

The imfamous Desert Rat (one post and gone) and Spursmad would also fall into this category who have proven they know stuff but can't be expected to get everything correct.

Yeah, for what its worth, and this is in no way an attack on Bombo (or me if in fact I am Bombo), I have no idea if he has EVER gotten anything right.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top