Ooh, your play on words cuts deep.
Ahem.
Ooh, your play on words cuts deep.
Does it matter if he did?
I guess we’re back to when does an accident become involuntary manslaughter.
Because he cause the contact with the 3rd player for one and it’s no way a natural position for his left leg to go to after that initial contact. He left one on him.How do you know, just out of interest? I am not arguing the opposite btw, I honestly don't know or even have a view that I feel I can back with any seriousness.
As you say elsewhere, might not make much if any difference to the outcome, of a manslaughter charge.
Fair enough. Soz.We had a disagreement. We got extremely personal and attacked each others dignity (username).
I apologise. Your opinion is as valid as mine and mine as yours!
Does it matter if he did?
I guess we’re back to when does an accident become involuntary manslaughter.
Because he cause the contact with the 3rd player for one and it’s no way a natural position for his left leg to go to after that initial contact. He left one on him.
As an example, I know when I watch rugby, having played rugby, when people are leaving one on someone. Same in football. The difference is that in those sports, people aren’t wearing razor sharp blades on their feet and even then, no one has ever taken a shoulder charge they’ve initiated (ie it wasn’t sudden and unexpected for him) and raised their outward leg in that direction, at that angle, to gain balance.
If a boxer hits an opponent in the back of the head because his opponent moves into an unexpected position, is that still negligent or reckless?Yes it does. An accident isn't manslaughter if there was no negligence or recklessness.
A boxer could commit Manslaughter or even murder if he punches an opponent in the neck or back of the head.
If he meant to use his skates to cause serious injury then he's committed a murder.
If a boxer hits an opponent in the back of the head because his opponent moves into an unexpected position, is that still negligent or reckless?
Like everything in life, there is nuance that needs to be applied and I‘m happy for the legal proceedings to play out. I’m not 100% either way.
NoIf a boxer hits an opponent in the back of the head because his opponent moves into an unexpected position, is that still negligent or reckless?
From what I’ve read, Johnson’s head was about 4 feet off the ground, which, unless he was a hobbit, wouldn’t be where he expected his head to be.What's the relevance? The hockey player that died was in natural position going towards goal.
The arrested player was in position of blocking another opposing player, barged that player and carried forward a kung-fu kicked the deceased.
There is nothing analogous in the two scenarios.
From what I’ve read, Johnson’s head was about 4 feet off the ground, which, unless he was a hobbit, wouldn’t be where he expected his head to be.
I get it, you’re totally convinced that he's bang to rights.
Time will tell if you are right.
From what I’ve read, Johnson’s head was about 4 feet off the ground, which, unless he was a hobbit, wouldn’t be where he expected his head to be.
I get it, you’re totally convinced that he's bang to rights.
Time will tell if you are right.
lol awesome debating with you.So you haven't seen the clip. His head was at normal height for the sport. And aligned to other players making attacking moves.
Not sure there's much point of you entering a debate tbh.
That’s true, but I think our usual suspect thinks he’s written the laws and knows exactly what and what doesn’t apply.I disagree on that one.
The law will decide, and whatever it does will be within the law.
But I don't think we will ever really know that side of it.
Have you seen this video?That’s true, but I think our usual suspect thinks he’s written the laws and knows exactly what and what doesn’t apply.
Up until the point of contact, yes.Have you seen this video?
And genuinely don’t see malice in the contact that was made?Up until the point of contact, yes.
My guess is that he’s gone to block him with his leg and it’s gone wrong. Now whether that is malicious or not, I don’t know.And genuinely don’t see malice in the contact that was made?
My guess is that he’s gone to block him with his leg and it’s gone wrong. Now whether that is malicious or not, I don’t know.
I’m not claiming to be an authority on Ice Hockey. I have skated to a reasonable standard, but never when being barged about.
My leaning is that it’s an accident that was caused either by an off-balance opponent or one that’s tried to block him that’s gone wrong.
If it’s the latter, then he’ll probably be charged with IM and it will be up to the prosecution to prove it.
I don’t think it’s binary though. It’s not 100% either way. To me.
My guess is that he’s gone to block him with his leg and it’s gone wrong. Now whether that is malicious or not, I don’t know.
I’m not claiming to be an authority on Ice Hockey. I have skated to a reasonable standard, but never when being barged about.
My leaning is that it’s an accident that was caused either by an off-balance opponent or one that’s tried to block him that’s gone wrong.
If it’s the latter, then he’ll probably be charged with IM and it will be up to the prosecution to prove it.
I don’t think it’s binary though. It’s not 100% either way. To me.