Big fish, small pond.
Globally? Ex-pats.
Sky, love em or loathe em, has made the EPL the biggest football draw on TV/Internet, so people “follow” the game here more. Plus, we are 24/7/365 drama (just look at the papers every day!), which is clickbait central for football fans.
I have the NewsNow Man City link bookmarked and the amount of clickbait dross on there, just because we are now significantly higher profile literally drives coverage….much as it did for Utd and Liverpool when these platforms and TV exposure for the EPL was exploding.
I don’t have IG, so I’ve no idea what is even on there, but the number of people poo pooing social media is, at best, ironic, given City TV and Twitter are regularly posted and discussed here, and City have exploded their social media footprint in the last 5-10 years.
The passion for Rangers and Celtic is currently more local than global, but if one of them got a wealthy owner with deep pockets who wanted to use that wealth to create a European power, then not only would they win the SPL every year, but they’d probably be decent in Europe (again?) and generate significantly more clicks, and thus social media presence.
As a City fan, born and raised. I’ve never really cared about social media, but to ignore it as irrelevant today is to bury one’s head in the sand (pun intended). Social media has helped create the global presence we now enjoy, even though local yokels deride anyone who never attended a Maine Rd, or grew up on the Kippax as a Johnny Come Lately.
Personally, I use the “anyone who never stood on the cinders or at the back of the North Stand” as my metric for “plastics!” Even then, you have to pass “The Tie-Breaker Test!”
1) Where was the Dave Watson Gap and what was so “special” about it?
2) Where were the ginnels, and do you have actual firsthand experience of stepping in dog shit in them?
3) Explain the term “City attendance” as used under Peter Swales.
;-)