If it was up to you would you ban the Sun newspaper from the Etihad?

[Gorton_Tubster]

No.

How come No? Just out of interest

 

[wagonman]

I avoid anyone who reads the Sun.

I KNOW we would have nothing in common.

I would rather hammer my thingy to a bit of 4 by 4 using a rancid, rusty nail than listen to the views of a Sun reader.

But I don't think City should lower themselves down into cesspit the Sun wallows in by banning them from the Etihad.

To destroy your enemy, first become his friend...


JJ

 

[BrianW]

Yes.

Except if we could get free copies, it could be torn into quarters and hung on nails in the khazis to save money on bog paper. It's all it's fit for.

 

[Dazzle84]

Can we ban the mail too?

 

[give it to gordon]

Aren't the Sun and mail owned by the same person/company ?

 

[trevorriley]

who actually likes the sun ?

Is there a football fan that says yes great paper that, always sing our praises.

its one of those papers thats full of shit.

 

[Bozzie]

Whatever their motivation, appeasing disgruntled Scousers, pandering to the anti City/Abu Dhabi narrative or the perceived white, working class prejudices there is definitely an orchestrated campaign by The Sun to portray Sterling in the worst possible way at every possible opportunity. That isn't the result of some lone, rogue journalist going 'off script', its a conscious business decision taken by senior management and sanctioned by the owners and, as such, needs addressing with the seriousness it warrants. If, as Martin Samuel says, our club's media department is far more active than we imagine then I'm sure they are looking at the possible courses of action as we speak. In terms of Sky Sports News and their selective editing of Sterling's tweet I can't see how that can be anything other than libellous and I hope the club go after them in the most public fashion starting with an official statement in support of Raheem and condemning Sky for their distortion of the facts. Same with The Sun, condemn them loudly and publicly and, for me, start off with banning that fat, odious little f***er Custis.

 

[Father Paul]

Yes I would.
Mentioning Sterling in an unrelated knife crime report should be the final straw for City too. Enough is enough.

Yes. They crossed a red line there. Should be banned until the end of the year at least but I doubt if we have the balls to do it. However, if I was Raheem
I would ask my legal representative to take a very close look at that particular report. It was vile and disgusting in equal measure.

 

[Didsbury Dave]

No. Haven't you learned anything? It isn't the City way. We behave with class, style and decency in all of our engagements in the outside world.

If you think we get bad press now, wait until you see what it would be like if we start getting peevish with the press.

 

[laserblue]

Don't ban the Sun. Just give anyone from that cesspoit of a paper a different catering experience from the rest of the journos. i.e. Stale potted meat butties with the ends curling up, overripe bananas and other fruit, stale rock cakes (potential toothbreakers) and a lukewarm 3rd time used teabag cuppa. That'll fuck Jabba Custis off big time if nothing else.