Rammy Blue said:fact is we tried to sign Kaka at Xmas for approx £90mil, we failed.
does anyone actually believe for 1 minute that we were selling him the dream of playing under Mark Hughes?
somehow i don't think that ADUG broke open the champagne when we signed Craig Bellamy, i am sure they would have cracked a few if Kaka had signed.....
ADUG showed their hand when the bid went in for Kaka, they will certainly have remembered the failed attempt.
would Kaka have signed if Jose was the boss at Xmas?
the most exciting summer in the history of being a city fan is nearly upon us, rejoice in being a blue.
twinkletoes said:tolmie's hairdoo said:The information is second hand - from posters and people claiming to be at said forum.
The same people who say they won't believe anything until on the OS, there has been nothing directly attributed to Cook ANYWHERE as a result of last night.
It works either way, when it can be suggested people hear what they want to hear.
We know the meeting took place and people heard Garry Cook speak. So your argument doesn't stand up.
tolmie's hairdoo said:twinkletoes said:tolmie's hairdoo said:The information is second hand - from posters and people claiming to be at said forum.
The same people who say they won't believe anything until on the OS, there has been nothing directly attributed to Cook ANYWHERE as a result of last night.
It works either way, when it can be suggested people hear what they want to hear.
We know the meeting took place and people heard Garry Cook speak. So your argument doesn't stand up.
Of course it does - those people who attended may well have been pro supporters of Hughes.
Just because the meeting took place and Garry Cook spoke at length does not mean he can be properly interpreted.
This is the accusation we throw at the bullshit press when things are twisted in interviews to suit agendas.
From what I now understand from the two posters you have cited, all that Cooke was paraphrased as saying is about organisations changing their managers each year.
Certainly not Cook bellowing 'Mark Hughes will be our manager next season.'
That's all we fans want to know, either way.
The only facts which remain are that neither Cooke, Khaldoon or anyone else from ADUG has felt the need to end this speculation one way or another.
And, because they haven't, people continue to make their own assumptions.
My own are based on what I consider reliable info that only one man's word will count - Sheikh Mansour.
And Jose is a very interested spectator in what is happening at our club.
tolmie's hairdoo said:twinkletoes said:tolmie's hairdoo said:The information is second hand - from posters and people claiming to be at said forum.
The same people who say they won't believe anything until on the OS, there has been nothing directly attributed to Cook ANYWHERE as a result of last night.
It works either way, when it can be suggested people hear what they want to hear.
We know the meeting took place and people heard Garry Cook speak. So your argument doesn't stand up.
Of course it does - those people who attended may well have been pro supporters of Hughes.
Just because the meeting took place and Garry Cook spoke at length does not mean he can be properly interpreted.
This is the accusation we throw at the bullshit press when things are twisted in interviews to suit agendas.
From what I now understand from the two posters you have cited, all that Cooke was paraphrased as saying is about organisations changing their managers each year.
Certainly not Cook bellowing 'Mark Hughes will be our manager next season.'
That's all we fans want to know, either way.
The only facts which remain are that neither Cooke, Khaldoon or anyone else from ADUG has felt the need to end this speculation one way or another.
And, because they haven't, people continue to make their own assumptions.
My own are based on what I consider reliable info that only one man's word will count - Sheikh Mansour.
And Jose is a very interested spectator in what is happening at our club.
twinkletoes said:tolmie's hairdoo said:twinkletoes said:tolmie's hairdoo said:The information is second hand - from posters and people claiming to be at said forum.
The same people who say they won't believe anything until on the OS, there has been nothing directly attributed to Cook ANYWHERE as a result of last night.
It works either way, when it can be suggested people hear what they want to hear.
We know the meeting took place and people heard Garry Cook speak. So your argument doesn't stand up.[/quote
Of course it does - those people who attended may well have been pro supporters of Hughes.
Just because the meeting took place and Garry Cook spoke at length does not mean he can be properly interpreted.
This is the accusation we throw at the bullshit press when things are twisted in interviews to suit agendas.
From what I now understand from the two posters you have cited, all that Cooke was paraphrased as saying is about organisations changing their managers each year.
Certainly not Cook bellowing 'Mark Hughes will be our manager next season.'
That's all we fans want to know, either way.
The only facts which remain are that neither Cooke, Khaldoon or anyone else from ADUG has felt the need to end this speculation one way or another.
And, because they haven't, people continue to make their own assumptions.
My own are based on what I consider reliable info that only one man's word will count - Sheikh Mansour.
And Jose is a very interested spectator in what is happening at our club.
We know all that but it doesn't mean it's true.
try not to sound too desperate mate...Hughes_head_scout said:Rammy and tolmie you both said that there will be a managerial change in june and there'll be big changes this summer do you stand by that.
If you do then what are your reasons
If its info your recievin how reliable would you say it was on a scale of 1 to 100