If Mourinho comes..

fact is we tried to sign Kaka at Xmas for approx £90mil, we failed.

does anyone actually believe for 1 minute that we were selling him the dream of playing under Mark Hughes?

somehow i don't think that ADUG broke open the champagne when we signed Craig Bellamy, i am sure they would have cracked a few if Kaka had signed.....

ADUG showed their hand when the bid went in for Kaka, they will certainly have remembered the failed attempt.

would Kaka have signed if Jose was the boss at Xmas?

the most exciting summer in the history of being a city fan is nearly upon us, rejoice in being a blue.
 
Bluemoonbaldboy said:
Most Hughes out arguements have an answer despite their denials the real reason is the club he had two spells with as far as I can figure because when the answers are given the typical reply is "fook off the rag t**t"

Are you so obsessed by the rags that you can't think of any other reason why supporters might not want him in charge next season.

I've never said anything like "fook off the rag t**t", and I'd bet 99% of the most ardent critics of Hughes haven't said anything like that either.

The real issue is fans patience the money is what some fans see they where expecting instant success and it don't work like that just like the Special One coming doesn't mean we will win anything

I'd also bet that 99% of Hughes critics on here never expected instant success, and still don't.
 
Rammy Blue said:
fact is we tried to sign Kaka at Xmas for approx £90mil, we failed.

does anyone actually believe for 1 minute that we were selling him the dream of playing under Mark Hughes?

somehow i don't think that ADUG broke open the champagne when we signed Craig Bellamy, i am sure they would have cracked a few if Kaka had signed.....

ADUG showed their hand when the bid went in for Kaka, they will certainly have remembered the failed attempt.

would Kaka have signed if Jose was the boss at Xmas?

the most exciting summer in the history of being a city fan is nearly upon us, rejoice in being a blue.

I have said since january that if Mourinho had been in charge Kaka would be a City player now!
 
Rammy Blue said:
fact is we tried to sign Kaka at Xmas for approx £90mil, we failed.

does anyone actually believe for 1 minute that we were selling him the dream of playing under Mark Hughes?

somehow i don't think that ADUG broke open the champagne when we signed Craig Bellamy, i am sure they would have cracked a few if Kaka had signed.....

ADUG showed their hand when the bid went in for Kaka, they will certainly have remembered the failed attempt.

would Kaka have signed if Jose was the boss at Xmas?

the most exciting summer in the history of being a city fan is nearly upon us, rejoice in being a blue.

Their inentions are clear for all to see (surely !?!?), they WILL make us one of the best teams in Europe... sooner the better.

Rammy with reagrds to imescales till going with earfly June ? Surely we have learnt lessons not to do it all last minute etc ?
 
tolmie's hairdoo said:
twinkletoes said:
Also, didn't Cook once say Thaksin was a decent guy!

He also insisted we would need a bigger trophy cabinet when Frank took over!

You see, even the Cookie monster can be in the dark/get it wrong as to the real goings-on behind the scenes with people who actually hold the power.

Like the rest of us, he didn't seem to know that Frank was in fact potless. Do you think he would even have considered taking the job if he had known?

And he certainly wasn't aware of ADUG on the horizon (because they weren't) when he signed on the dotted line months prior to their arrival.


Massaging each others egos doesn't mean you are right!


And neither does burying your head in the sand and being close-minded enough to consider all the options on the table![/quote]

As Benitez says, "I am talking about facts" (Not hearsay)[/quote]


And your facts? 'Based on an anonymous MUEN poster insisting Cook had said Hughes was safe![/quote]

Another message from MUEN (referring to the other poster's claims)

Blue kev is quite correct , there was a supporters meeting last night it was attended by my nephew, his information is spot on, Bert you no your not supposed to have a sence of humour on here!
 
The information is second hand - from posters and people claiming to be at said forum.


The same people who say they won't believe anything until on the OS, there has been nothing directly attributed to Cook ANYWHERE as a result of last night.

It works either way, when it can be suggested people hear what they want to hear.
 
tolmie's hairdoo said:
The information is second hand - from posters and people claiming to be at said forum.


The same people who say they won't believe anything until on the OS, there has been nothing directly attributed to Cook ANYWHERE as a result of last night.

It works either way, when it can be suggested people hear what they want to hear.

We know the meeting took place and people heard Garry Cook speak. So your argument doesn't stand up.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.