Time will tell but Haaland's potential gives him the chance to be one of the very, very best, Kane has peaked for me.Haaland is better
Sorry but that just isn’t true. He was and still is a great player. I just think that he was too expensive for a player nearing his thirties and I am glad we didnt pay £150m for him only for that reason.Basically had one good game- at the Etihad this season. If he was a city player he'd have managed four or five good games at the Etihad. Bullet dodged, good look to him and his silly chairman.
I think we would certainly have made the Cl final with Kane in the team and already won the league. He doesn't miss those key chances Mahrez missed. That said if we had a proper left back we would have been in the same position. We are still shipping goals down our left side. We keep the ball so much we don't need to defend much. But we still give away easy chances to teams which are much poorer than us.Kane's a top draw goal scorer in my opinion(who also takes a decent penalty) we would have had the title sown up now and probably been in the Champions league final given the chances we missed in the first leg of the semi final, but his cost and age and his chairman robbing him of the chance means he's missed out. When Haarland comes good next and following seasons his misfortune is our gain.
I'm afraid the lack of left back and injuries have cost us, that said i'll be more than happy with the title tomorrow.I think we would certainly have made the Cl final with Kane in the team and already won the league. He doesn't miss those key chances Mahrez missed. That said if we had a proper left back we would have been in the same position. We are still shipping goals down our left side. We keep the ball so much we don't need to defend much. But we still give away easy chances to teams which are much poorer than us.