NipHolmes
Well-Known Member
BillyShears said:The cookie monster said:Fair enoughBillyShears said:I've got more than one mate so you'll have to be a little more specific than that ... ;)
No seriously, when Hughes was on his last legs, the number outstanding candidates for the City job were from AD's point of view Mourinho, Hiddink, Wenger, and Mancini. At least those are the four who were approached. I know someone I trust told me that Marwood and Cook had made a big play for Wenger and that he had at least initially been receptive to the approach as he was at that time going to be out of contract the following summer.
I was joking tbh :)
I think if the owners did ever let mancini go (which i hope they dont) 100% dont want the fucker from madrid,wenger is just a ludicrous idea
The one you have championed a lot on here klopp,i could def go along with that..
I still think we will win the cup 2nd in the league and bobby will be safe :)
When Hughes was sacked if we'd taken a poll on Bluemoon as to who should replace him Mancini or Wenger ... who d'you reckon would've won ?
Hit it out of the park mate, of course that poll is bollocks though due to some ridiculous technicality.
I still never got a Jose or Mancini answer. The guys a waste of time, I rate his opinion the same as I rate the food standards agency - beef department.
Moratti employed both Jose and Mancini. He rates Jose higher and speaks fondly of him, almost like a son who he watched walk for the first time. No response to that and of course we get the 'he poked tito in the eye' spiel. Like a broken fucking record. Twisting to try and win his unwinable argument.
I wanna strap this guy to a fucking chair and prop his eyes open with matches other than City. He reminds me of North Koreans who think Kim got record hole in ones and beat Brazil in the WC. Brainwashed and clueless.