I'll boo if i want to!

glen quagmire said:
Blue Tooth said:
Tevez was fucked...his touch was poor today and subbing him was the right decision.
Barry was brought on to provide more width and Yaya was pushed forward.
It was an attacking substitution.


Attacking???? Yaya was fucked as well! It should've been striker for striker and push on, not barry to sit in the middle to enable a guy who's allready shattered to drive forward! Carlos wasn't that fucked, he's frustrated at being isolated.

Barry didn't sit in the middle.....Tevez was fucked.....don't know what game you were watching fella.The substitution had attacking intent..I can't help it if you refuse to see that.Too many City fans are buying into the negative Mancini bullshit..I watched a City side that pegged back Brum and should have comfortably won ther game...but the Mancini haters sat around me were moaning about our 'negative' tactics before we had even kicked off...Fucking boring cnuts...don't like it...don't fucking come.
I'm a City supporter and was on my feet cheering the team forward right to the final whistle...and they put in a shift second half as far as I am concerned...shame we could not get a whole stadium behind the team though.
 
SalfordCityBlue said:
Glen you are believing too much of what you read.

The game was nothing like you described.

Tevez is not unsubbable. He didn't play well today, and looked exhausted. Unfortunately, our options were Rocky and Jo, so we probably stuck with Carlos for too long if anything. Not knocking Carlos, his efforts this year (and last) have been superhuman.

The suggestion that if he'd stayed on a further seven minutes he would suddenly have started to play better is, frankly, laughable.

The booing for that change showed a complete lack of football knowledge to me. And the fact we looked more dangerous in the short time left afterwards doesn't seem to have dulled some people's inappropriate rage.


I didn't 'read' anything! I watched from my ST seat like i do every other week. The reason why we are laughed at as we get straight into 'ickle city' mode, when things aren't going our way, we should be more demanding from the manager and team, we should be able to criticise when things are shit! I've witnessed some shite the past 25 years, it's time we got what we deserved, for our unwavering support. We now have the resources to compete with any team on the planet, we just don't seem to be pushing on.


I wasn't a hughes outer or inner, but i'll bet anything with anyone yaya would not have dreamed of fucking off at half time with hughes at the helm.
 
interpol said:
With you my friend!

If someone could explain why, after £200M+ outlay on players we can end up with Roque Santa Cruz as our sole striker for the last 10 mins, we are not able to express of our opinion.

Did all the non-booers applaud then?

I applauded Hart Kompany and De Jong who all applauded the fans who could be arsed to stay and get behind the team til the end!

And forget £200+million, that outlay is a fuckin huge over the top figure that really when you look at the quality we've got, could be slashed in half! Some of our players wouldn't get near the Spurs team, let alone Arsenal United and Chelsea!
 
glen quagmire said:
I wasn't a hughes outer or inner, but i'll bet anything with anyone yaya would not have dreamed of fucking off at half time with hughes at the helm.

Fuck Hughes. Long gone. Utterly irrelevant to our club.
 
if you watch tonight if them shithouses decide to show it, tev asked to come off, wether he had a pull or not only he and the bench knows it, i really am hopeing something changes tactics wise, we have got stoke in two weeks and make no bones about it they will be up for it?
 
SalfordCityBlue said:
Glen you are believing too much of what you read.

The game was nothing like you described.

Tevez is not unsubbable. He didn't play well today, and looked exhausted. Unfortunately, our options were Rocky and Jo, so we probably stuck with Carlos for too long if anything. Not knocking Carlos, his efforts this year (and last) have been superhuman.

The suggestion that if he'd stayed on a further seven minutes he would suddenly have started to play better is, frankly, laughable.

The booing for that change showed a complete lack of football knowledge to me. And the fact we looked more dangerous in the short time left afterwards doesn't seem to have dulled some people's inappropriate rage.

I doubt anyone was thinking that. Perhaps people were thinking that he's more likely to score a scrappy 2 yarder than anyone else - you know, like he has done numerous times since he's been here(and even in 1st half of today's game)?

Don't talk about footballing knowledge. It's laughable. Barry should have come on for a defender or De Jong (infact De Jong shouldn't have even started today) not for a player who has shown time and time again, for West Ham, the Rags and City, the ability to score important goals even if not playing well.

RSC for Milner was just as bad of a substitution, if not worse. RSC thrives on crosses - Milner is one of the better crossers of the ball in England.

I don't want Mancini out but I do want him to adapt to the Premier League -NOT try and make the Premier League adapt to him. He will fail to do the latter.
 
ElanJo said:
SalfordCityBlue said:
Glen you are believing too much of what you read.

The game was nothing like you described.

Tevez is not unsubbable. He didn't play well today, and looked exhausted. Unfortunately, our options were Rocky and Jo, so we probably stuck with Carlos for too long if anything. Not knocking Carlos, his efforts this year (and last) have been superhuman.

The suggestion that if he'd stayed on a further seven minutes he would suddenly have started to play better is, frankly, laughable.

The booing for that change showed a complete lack of football knowledge to me. And the fact we looked more dangerous in the short time left afterwards doesn't seem to have dulled some people's inappropriate rage.

I doubt anyone was thinking that. Perhaps people were thinking that he's more likely to score a scrappy 2 yarder than anyone else - you know, like he has done numerous times since he's been here(and even in 1st half of today's game)?

Don't talk about footballing knowledge. It's laughable. Barry should have come on for a defender or De Jong (infact De Jong shouldn't have even started today) not for a player who has shown time and time again, for West Ham, the Rags and City, the ability to score important goals even if not playing well.

RSC for Milner was just as bad of a substitution, if not worse. RSC thrives on crosses - Milner is one of the better crossers of the ball in England.

I don't want Mancini out but I do want him to adapt to the Premier League -NOT try and make the Premier League adapt to him. He will fail to do the latter.


Good post Elanjo.
 
Bottom line is Mancini's not big enough to handle all the egos. When Chelsea splashed the cash they brought in Mourinho who was a proven winner and commanded respect, even of the most highly paid. There is no doubt in my mind that the club will be looking at bringing in a manager of similar stature to sort it out. We can't afford to let Mancini serve his apprenticeship with us.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.