I'm thinking it is corrupt

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lucky toma

I'm not insisting that you debate with me, am I?

Merely pointing out that you have three options:

1. Debate
2. Don't
3. Don't but continually offer up insults

Choosing 3 over 2 is just childish, and makes you look lik a keyboard warrior.
 
Lucky Toma said:
warren_richards04 said:
Neville - no offence, but that post means nothing.

I could post the opposite - not much of a debate, is it?
Click to expand...

Warren, where does this assumption come from that people actually want to debate with you? You seem to be under the impression that its' something we should do. Why? I couldnt give a steaming fuck what you think and have no desire whatsoever to even try and change your mind 0.0001%

An analogy of the previous few pages -

Man walks into a newsagents.
'The Mirror and a debate please'
'That's 45p'
'What about the debate?'
'What? Do you want the paper or not. I'm busy here'
'Exactly how are you busy? I want proof that you're busy'
'Look, just fuck off will you pal'
'Oh fuck off is it? How very mature of you. I've come in here for a mature debate and you in return throw abuse at me'
'Here, take the paper. It's free. Now just fuck off'
Click to expand...
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3n3LL338aGA[/youtube]

btw...for the rags on here...if you keep walking into a barbers youre eventually going to get a haircut....if you dont expect derision coming on a City forum after THAT debacle last night you must be mental
 
They get dubious decisions in their favour in pretty much every game. Surely no team is naturally that lucky.
 
warren_richards04 said:
Lucky toma

I'm not insisting that you debate with me, am I?

Merely pointing out that you have three options:

1. Debate
2. Don't
3. Don't but continually offer up insults

Choosing 3 over 2 is just childish, and makes you look lik a keyboard warrior.
Click to expand...

I'll take number 3 please you rag ****.
 
I said it before, but worth mentioning again, in the period 1992 to 2007 United conceded only 12 penalties at home. So that's 12 penalties in 15 seasons, or 291 matches to be more accurate. Anyone honestly suggesting they believe what this statistic is indicating, namely that United committed just 12 fouls in their own area in 291 league matches, is seriously deluded.
 
Matty

And in that time, what were other club's figures like?

I can see your point, but as the most successful club of that period, you'd expect them to concede less, surely?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.