You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Is now the time to consider Mancini's tenure at the club
- Thread starter Mike D
- Start date
smeeagain said:The Future's Blue said:This is not the time to consider the managers position unless you are looking for instant success or never really wanted him in the first place.
i disagree , now is the ideal time to replace him , theres enough games left for any new manager to really rally the team, and challenge united
otherwise pray for a second miracle
You don't win a league because of a miracle, you win it because you were the better team over the course of the season.
Danielmanc
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Oct 2008
- Messages
- 1,461
smeeagain said:The Future's Blue said:This is not the time to consider the managers position unless you are looking for instant success or never really wanted him in the first place.
i disagree , now is the ideal time to replace him , theres enough games left for any new manager to really rally the team, and challenge united
otherwise pray for a second miracle
It wasn't a miracle last season. We won more matches at the end than they did - we also scored more goals. No miracle - just that we were better.
BlueAnorak
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 27,778
I truly hope that the City manager is not sacked (ever) for ONE season when the team goes slightly backwards - especially if like Mancini they have been successful.
We must give our manager the full length of their contract (another 2.5 years at least for Mancini till the contract break-clause when City or Mancini can back out) unless they are totally rank - as Hughes was.
Secure job tenure will allow the City manager to build long term time success!
We must give our manager the full length of their contract (another 2.5 years at least for Mancini till the contract break-clause when City or Mancini can back out) unless they are totally rank - as Hughes was.
Secure job tenure will allow the City manager to build long term time success!
Paulmcfc2703
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 Aug 2008
- Messages
- 8,933
The issue is though for us to build towards the future it is vital to comply to FFP. To comply to that you need to be successful in Europe and for all his domestic success Mancini seems clueless in the CL.BlueAnorak said:I truly hope that the City manager is not sacked (ever) for ONE season when the team goes slightly backwards - especially if like Mancini they have been successful.
We must give our manager the full length of their contract (another 2.5 years at least for Mancini till the contract break-clause when City or Mancini can back out) unless they are totally rank - as Hughes was.
Secure job tenure will allow the City manager to build long term time success!
andyhinch
Well-Known Member
Not sure if I'm happy with some of the sense being talk here:)BlueAnorak said:I truly hope that the City manager is not sacked (ever) for ONE season when the team goes slightly backwards - especially if like Mancini they have been successful.
We must give our manager the full length of their contract (another 2.5 years at least for Mancini till the contract break-clause when City or Mancini can back out) unless they are totally rank - as Hughes was.
Secure job tenure will allow the City manager to build long term time success!
grim up north
Well-Known Member
smeeagain said:The Future's Blue said:This is not the time to consider the managers position unless you are looking for instant success or never really wanted him in the first place.
i disagree , now is the ideal time to replace him , theres enough games left for any new manager to really rally the team, and challenge united
otherwise pray for a second miracle
We are six points worse off than last season and we had a bad January, those points can be made up. If we get more points than last season but come second is that an improvement or not?
B
B
bluemc1
Guest
grim up north said:smeeagain said:The Future's Blue said:This is not the time to consider the managers position unless you are looking for instant success or never really wanted him in the first place.
i disagree , now is the ideal time to replace him , theres enough games left for any new manager to really rally the team, and challenge united
otherwise pray for a second miracle
We are six points worse off than last season and we had a bad January, those points can be made up. If we get more points than last season but come second is that an improvement or not?
yes it is, would just be someone has improved more, if we get less points have we gone backwards ?
BlueAnorak said:I truly hope that the City manager is not sacked (ever) for ONE season when the team goes slightly backwards - especially if like Mancini they have been successful.
We must give our manager the full length of their contract (another 2.5 years at least for Mancini till the contract break-clause when City or Mancini can back out) unless they are totally rank - as Hughes was.
Secure job tenure will allow the City manager to build long term time success!
sour alex needed time at the swamp, Bob so far has done better in the time he's had.
Danielmanc
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Oct 2008
- Messages
- 1,461
samharris said:BlueAnorak said:I truly hope that the City manager is not sacked (ever) for ONE season when the team goes slightly backwards - especially if like Mancini they have been successful.
We must give our manager the full length of their contract (another 2.5 years at least for Mancini till the contract break-clause when City or Mancini can back out) unless they are totally rank - as Hughes was.
Secure job tenure will allow the City manager to build long term time success!
sour alex needed time at the swamp, Bob so far has done better in the time he's had.
I agree but you'll just get the "anyone could have done it with his resources" reply from those arrogant enough to think it is easy to win the PL