I'll have to disagree with you. Navas and Isco are two very different players. Navas is just a technically decent winger whereas Isco is a multifaceted attacking mid.Phuket Blue said:bluelol said:BlueForever123 said:Lets all have a disco
Silva, Navas, Isco
Na na na na
Me and my 6 yr old have been singing this today. Hope we can sing it next season
You have me singing this now, so I will never get to sleep!!
Silva, Navas, Isco, Silva, Navas, Isco a Yayaya a Yayaya,
Silva, Navas, Isco, Silva, Navas, Isco a Yayaya a Yayaya,
Brilliant!! I'm singing it already too.
Alas, it may have to be:
"Silva, Nasri, Isco, .... Cavani (Tevez/Dzeko and), Aguero, Yaya ya ya, Yaya ya ya!"
I can't see us buying both Navas and Isco. Seems like Navas could be the fallback option. I think maybe we are also talking to both as a way to strengthen our negotiating position. Perhaps we have finally learned how to play this game and not get fleeced?
I assure you Txiki knows the difference.
We've been craving a decent winger that can change the point of attack for years now. I think our management has identified the need for someone like this as our lack of width is blatant. Navas shouldn't affect Isco's transfer IMO, and I worry about our management if they'd consider Navas a plan B for Isco. Not like for like at all, and I can see Isco starting regularly. Navas will be a substitute and rotation player for us.
But hey, what do I know (; ?