Isco

[kanovic]

I would put Isco in the team ahead of Nasri & Navas

Really???? Wow people are giving this kid way more credit then he deserves. Yes his very talented but let's not go too far. A Nasri on his good day is still way better, I'm sure isco will surpass him one day but not yet. I think if he was not linked with us people would not be drooling over him this much and I doubt very many here watched many games of his. Great talent if we get him but if we don't oh well silva nasri navas roddy milner I'm more the happy with.

A Nasri on his day is better!!?!?! Lol.

Sure is

-- Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:01 pm --

A Nasri on his day is better!!?!?! Lol.

I think they're on very similar levels to be fair when they are both on form. That goal of Isco's could be right out of Nasri's playbook too.

You mean the three games a season when Nasri plays well?

And in the other 57....

Actually all last season except a few games he played well this season I would say he played well but neither for silva so are you now going to say isco is better then silva?

-- Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:01 pm --

A Nasri on his day is better!!?!?! Lol.

I think they're on very similar levels to be fair when they are both on form. That goal of Isco's could be right out of Nasri's playbook too.

You mean the three games a season when Nasri plays well?

And in the other 57....

Actually all last season except a few games he played well this season I would say he played well but neither did silva so are you now going to say isco is better then silva?

 

[taconinja]

A Nasri on his day is better!!?!?! Lol.

I think they're on very similar levels to be fair when they are both on form. That goal of Isco's could be right out of Nasri's playbook too.

You mean the three games a season when Nasri plays well?

And in the other 57....

Don't really want to do this argument again. I'll state that my stance is that I trust Pellegrini to evaluate the talent we have and get the best out of it.

 

[Joehannes]

Being ineffective but not actually doing anything badly doesn't mean playing well. Because that's generally how Nasri plays.

I reckon Isco is better now and has the potential to become much better in the future. If we signed him, we would have one of the most talented midfielders in the world, hopefully for the next 10 years.

 

[kanovic]

People saying we need isco over cavani or that they don't care if we don't get cavani as long as we sign isco is just ridiculous. Lol wow

 

[pudge]

People saying we need isco over cavani or that they don't care if we don't get cavani as long as we sign isco is just ridiculous. Lol wow

I know right?!

How dare they have a personal opinion, cunts.

 

[southstandblue27]

Looks very good on the ball, perhaps his movement off it isn't as good as it could be but he's very young and I'm sure in a couple of seasons he will be a world beater.

 

[kanovic]

Being ineffective but not actually doing anything badly doesn't mean playing well. Because that's generally how Nasri plays.

I reckon Isco is better now and has the potential to become much better in the future. If we signed him, we would have one of the most talented midfielders in the world, hopefully for the next 10 years.

Is his fault though? If his effective and sets plays up and our striker miss whos fault is that? Nasris? Isco will be better I admit that but now I would pick Nasri just my opionion. But I'm happy with whatever team we have even the current one of we don't get is isco or cavani or anyone I'm perfectly fine with our team and will support them either way not act like we will lose the title just bc we did not get one player.<br /><br />-- Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:10 pm --<br /><br />

People saying we need isco over cavani or that they don't care if we don't get cavani as long as we sign isco is just ridiculous. Lol wow

I know right?!

How dare they have a personal opinion, *****.

So you're saying I'm not allowed my opinion and say its ridiculous?

 

[Joehannes]

People saying we need isco over cavani or that they don't care if we don't get cavani as long as we sign isco is just ridiculous. Lol wow

I know right?!

How dare they have a personal opinion, cunts.

Heh.

If it were a case of Isco + Martínez or Cavani or an alternative to Isco, I'd pick the former every tome personally, even only having seen Jackson Martínez three or four times.

 

[simonmdm]

Very good control and Finish by him.

 

[pudge]

Being ineffective but not actually doing anything badly doesn't mean playing well. Because that's generally how Nasri plays.

I reckon Isco is better now and has the potential to become much better in the future. If we signed him, we would have one of the most talented midfielders in the world, hopefully for the next 10 years.

Is his fault though? If his effective and sets plays up and our striker miss whos fault is that? Nasris? Isco will be better I admit that but now I would pick Nasri just my opionion. But I'm happy with whatever team we have even the current one of we don't get is isco or cavani or anyone I'm perfectly fine with our team and will support them either way not act like we will lose the title just bc we did not get one player.

-- Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:10 pm --

People saying we need isco over cavani or that they don't care if we don't get cavani as long as we sign isco is just ridiculous. Lol wow

I know right?!

How dare they have a personal opinion, *****.

So you're saying I'm not allowed my opinion and say its ridiculous?

No.

You're not acknowledging that people can have an opinion on who they would prefer.

Only when I highlight that it is a personal choice did you attempt to deflect it as such