Isco

kanovic said:
Joehannes said:
Being ineffective but not actually doing anything badly doesn't mean playing well. Because that's generally how Nasri plays.

I reckon Isco is better now and has the potential to become much better in the future. If we signed him, we would have one of the most talented midfielders in the world, hopefully for the next 10 years.
Is his fault though? If his effective and sets plays up and our striker miss whos fault is that? Nasris? Isco will be better I admit that but now I would pick Nasri just my opionion. But I'm happy with whatever team we have even the current one of we don't get is isco or cavani or anyone I'm perfectly fine with our team and will support them either way not act like we will lose the title just bc we did not get one player.
If he had created a shitload of chances as Silva did, then no. But he didn't.
 
pudge said:
kanovic said:
People saying we need isco over cavani or that they don't care if we don't get cavani as long as we sign isco is just ridiculous. Lol wow
I know right?!

How dare they have a personal opinion, cunts.
So true.

Isco is more important than Cavani though, I agree with him there.

And Isco is far better than Nasri as in sure we'll see MP agree with. More direct and doesn't slow play down. Can also beat a man.
 
You know what would be swell? Having several creative midfielders and a manager stressing movement off the ball.

That's my dream.
 
Just watched the first 55 mins.

Wow,he is the real deal.

Playing as a deep lying playmaker he is very effective,he has an eye for the killer ball,bags of energy and enthusiasm and certainly isn't afraid of putting himself about.

He will be,and probably already is,far superior to Nasri.

With Fernandinho holding,i can see a midfield of him,Silva and Navas working a treat behind Aguero and,hopefully,Cavani.

Yes I have left Yaya out......

We must sign this player,he will be a major star.
 
kanovic said:
People saying we need isco over cavani or that they don't care if we don't get cavani as long as we sign isco is just ridiculous. Lol wow

Because people are saying that Dzeko would be a more effective striker in a team with width and pace and it might be okay to keep what we have.
 
pudge said:
kanovic said:
Joehannes said:
Being ineffective but not actually doing anything badly doesn't mean playing well. Because that's generally how Nasri plays.

I reckon Isco is better now and has the potential to become much better in the future. If we signed him, we would have one of the most talented midfielders in the world, hopefully for the next 10 years.
Is his fault though? If his effective and sets plays up and our striker miss whos fault is that? Nasris? Isco will be better I admit that but now I would pick Nasri just my opionion. But I'm happy with whatever team we have even the current one of we don't get is isco or cavani or anyone I'm perfectly fine with our team and will support them either way not act like we will lose the title just bc we did not get one player.

-- Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:10 pm --

pudge said:
I know right?!

How dare they have a personal opinion, *****.
So you're saying I'm not allowed my opinion and say its ridiculous?
No.

You're not acknowledging that people can have an opinion on who they would prefer.

Only when I highlight that it is a personal choice did you attempt to deflect it as such
So I have to acknowledge other people have opinions before stating mine? Please stfu with that shit. It's a discussion forum people can say and express anything thy want just like I can say its ridiculous all I want I don't have acknowledge anything. I won't be butt hurt like you if someone does not agree with me.
 
kanovic said:
pudge said:
kanovic said:
Is his fault though? If his effective and sets plays up and our striker miss whos fault is that? Nasris? Isco will be better I admit that but now I would pick Nasri just my opionion. But I'm happy with whatever team we have even the current one of we don't get is isco or cavani or anyone I'm perfectly fine with our team and will support them either way not act like we will lose the title just bc we did not get one player.

-- Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:10 pm --


So you're saying I'm not allowed my opinion and say its ridiculous?
No.

You're not acknowledging that people can have an opinion on who they would prefer.

Only when I highlight that it is a personal choice did you attempt to deflect it as such
So I have to acknowledge other people have opinions before stating mine? Please stfu with that shit. It's a discussion forum people can say and express anything thy want just like I can say its ridiculous all I want I don't have acknowledge anything. I won't be butt hurt like you if someone does not agree with me.
"I'd prefer Isco over Cavani"

"You're stupid"

.... you don't see the difference?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.