I clarified exactly what I meant one post later because I recognised that the original post could have been open to misinterpretation.
But its exactly your clarification which was contentious too.
You brought up a link. In that link 90% of the brittish jews claimed that they support the existance of the Jewish state, and 59% of the brittish jews self described as zionists.
You made the claim, prior to providing that link, that 90% of all jews are zionists, and then refered to that link to support that claim.
I then reacted to you, saying that the source didnt support the claims you made. You then made an argument in which you re-defined zionism for the purpose of supporting your claim. You argued that supporting the existance of Israel was an equivalance to the term zionism, and that hence 90% of the people there were zionists irrespective in that only 59% self described as zionists.
So i thought that your counter argument or "clarification", only led to a more contentious claim. I thoughtyou should be challanged on that claim, but since it was off topic to begin with in that thread i expessiongly asked you to continue the debate via private messages. You did not, you continued to post about that off topic matter on a thread where it didnt belng in a fashion in which it remained contentious. I then argued you should bring the argument elsewhere, by suggesting you create a thread on the matter of contention, which you also refused.
Maybe it would have been simpler if you just admitted that it was a pretty silly argument you made.
However it was only ever a minor point as far as the reason for the post was concerned. Why you’ve blown it up into a huge discussion
funny that you argue im blowing it up but you yourself dont seem to be doing much to deflating it.
Frankly i thought it could have been an interesting discussion, if discussed in the right manner, but it seems that it illicits a lot of reactions that are of a questionable rhetorical nature to me.
has no relevance to the actual point I was making which you have persistently ignored. I have no interest in any further engagement with you if you can’t even accept that a clearly antisemitic poster is what it is in spite of me patiently explaining why on a number of occasions.
You claimed that poster advocated for removing 30.000 people, i asked you where that poster said so much and you "dared to refuse" to answer me. Not a little Hyperbole that was?
