super_city_si
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Dec 2007
- Messages
- 48,357
Fuck me May as well have ferdinard as manager. Hes just as clueless
Why?? Nobody wants a fucking runners up medal, it means Jack shit.
I noticed Henderson being fucking shite.Well I thought the city England players had a good tournament, the rags not so much, the dippers? I didn’t even notice any of them.
Not for me. Thought he was woeful tonight, Stones didn’t put a foot wrong all tournament.Sterling was England's player of the tournament.
Mancini kept attacking until fairly late on. He knew that he could beat us on penalties.We had a stronger deeper squad. Better management won it. After HT we didn’t have any answers to their change in tactics and it looked like there would only be one winner. No blame for the players. Poor management and tactics and no thinking on his feet by Waistcoat.
Think you quoted the wrong post!That’s because Liverpool isn’t IN England.
There's no comparison between Pep and the Waistcoat, he's tactically useless and a coward. England's players must be hugely pissed off having to play those tactics. I can't think of one team that plays like that so why tell the team to follow those tactics.Didn’t we blame Pep for our CL defeat?
Tbf to the rags they haven't had much practice as rat faced penandez hogs them all...On the plus side,you can see we have the best technical English players.
I think the City players had a great tournament.
Kind of ironic those Rag penalties sum up the Rags in general.A team full of players that think they are better than they actually are.Technically they are fucking awful,flatter to deceive.
I recall Brazil doing it with Zico in the World Cup and that didn't work out too well.No need to put the blame on the players.
Missing penalties after playing 3 mins of football isn't letting anyone down.
Southgate was too hesitant making changes and the penalty subs (emulating OGS) was a daft thing to do.
I'd be interested to know if this tactic is statistically successful.