I'd believe it.
I know I've said it before but we touch our toes when selling players out of sentiment.
England international , 27 - entering his prime , to a direct rival
fk sentiment
I'd believe it.
I know I've said it before but we touch our toes when selling players out of sentiment.
Chelsea in reality might be the only club in for Sterling. Do you take what you can get now or keep an unhappy player around for a year and let him walk for free?Yeah cos we're holding out for £50 million for Gabby but will sell a better player for less. Clown.
Who says hes unhappy?Chelsea in reality might be the only club in for Sterling. Do you take what you can get now or keep an unhappy player around for a year and let him walk for free?
I agree but history dictates we sell lowEngland international , 27 - entering his prime , to a direct rival
fk sentiment
Chelsea in reality might be the only club in for Sterling. Do you take what you can get now or keep an unhappy player around for a year and let him walk for free?
Yet you lot seem to think that’s what Phillips is worth!It's about the optics of it though. If we keep accepting piss taking bids for our players then that is all we will ever get. We should stand firm on £50 million for Gabby no matter how desperate he is to leave and equally we should only sell Sterling if an appropriate bid comes in.
I'd rather the players walk for free than clubs taking the piss out of us and offering fees you'd struggle to sign a decent Championship player with.
It's about the optics of it though. If we keep accepting piss taking bids for our players then that is all we will ever get. We should stand firm on £50 million for Gabby no matter how desperate he is to leave and equally we should only sell Sterling if an appropriate bid comes in.
I'd rather the players walk for free than clubs taking the piss out of us and offering fees you'd struggle to sign a decent Championship player with.