blue ranger
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Oct 2008
- Messages
- 2,722
Straight swap Salah for Sterling. Why not :-)
I don’t want him at City. I’m just saying we can be shit stirring on the sly telling Salahs agent we’ll pay him what he wants just so he gets what he wants from Liverpool. They’ve caused plenty of shit with City over the past few years, it’s only right to play them at their game.I hope not. No matter his qualities. He's cheated (dived) far too much for me to ever have ANY kind of respect for him as a player.
I like your thinkingI don’t want him at City. I’m just saying we can be shit stirring on the sly telling Salahs agent we’ll pay him what he wants just so he gets what he wants from Liverpool. They’ve caused plenty of shit with City over the past few years, it’s only right to play them at their game.
Hopefully this is his year to come to the fore, and nail down that right wing spotIf Sterling goes I would be confident in the boy Palmer , top class that kid
More likely his sister.Neymar junior
That would melt the internetDaily Fail carrying the story that salah can leave for 60m this summer.
We should look for a similar fee for Raz, but I think Jesus fee has set the standard.
45 to 50m
Do you really think those bitter bastards would ever forgive Sterling for having the temerity to leave for a more successful club and the prospect of honours?Straight swap Salah for Sterling. Why not :-)
It also generates hope or even opportunity for other younger academy stars.people have too much a hardon for buybacks, we don't ever use them, we used it one time for angelino and he wasn't good enough to stay, made a decent profit on him but no one will want to return to the club only to be re-sold again. end of the day if someone has the potential to play for city, don't sell them to begin with. imo they are selling the ones that they don't feel will make it here so i dont really think the buybacks are that necessary