It's Quiet 17 - Glory Thread

That's not what I'm talking about, but since we've gone there, DeLigt is not Haaland...there are more than one club who would pay a $150 mil RC in 3 years time for Haaland if he wanted out...even $200 mil...PSG refused to grant Verratti a RC...and I have never heard a single mention of a Pogba buyout clause throughout his soap opera of a tenure at MU...my point is simply just because Raiola was his agent it doesn't entail an automatic RC...if City granted him one it means they had to in order to sign him...that may have been the same for anyone I'm sure...personally I don't give a rat's ass if Haaland has one or not...I ecstatic that he signed with us...I was commenting on what I believe is a false narrative, that Raiola = automatic RC...
I was told by a member of the forum in private a number for Haaland’s release clause that is A LOT more than €150M. Let’s say, it’s a number that no club would pay. And for it to even be triggered, there would need club performance numbers met. This member told me I could use the number next week as more should be made public. So in that sense, it is no different than De Ligt’s. Now let’s be clear, of course it’s not every Raiola client that has a release clause, but he would naturally engineer a mechanism to benefit each client specifically in a process of contract renewal. This is different from when Spanish clubs have to design their own release clauses by law
 
Lewandowski has asked to leave apparently. Barcelona are the supposed likely destination.

I wonder if that'll force their hand freeing up some De Jong wages..
 
Why anyone is panicking over a RC is beyond me. If he does well, it means we're successful and there's no reason he won't extend that contract. It's apparent that he wants to be here unlike Sane or Ferran who had other priorities. And if he doesn't do well, that 150m will go a long way into replacing him with someone better. And finally, why would we even want to keep him if he wanted to leave? RC or not, the club's policy seems to let players go if they wanted to.
 
I was told by a member of the forum in private a number for Haaland’s release clause that is A LOT more than €150M. Let’s say, it’s a number that no club would pay. And for it to even be triggered, there would need club performance numbers met. This member told me I could use the number next week as more should be made public. So in that sense, it is no different than De Ligt’s. Now let’s be clear, of course it’s not every Raiola client that has a release clause, but he would naturally engineer a mechanism to benefit each client specifically in a process of contract renewal. This is different from when Spanish clubs have to design their own release
I was told by a member of the forum in private a number for Haaland’s release clause that is A LOT more than €150M. Let’s say, it’s a number that no club would pay. And for it to even be triggered, there would need club performance numbers met. This member told me I could use the number next week as more should be made public. So in that sense, it is no different than De Ligt’s. Now let’s be clear, of course it’s not every Raiola client that has a release clause, but he would naturally engineer a mechanism to benefit each client specifically in a process of contract renewal. This is different from when Spanish clubs have to design their own release clauses by law
Hey, I hope its a Messi type RC, lol...
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.