D
D
Deleted member 87819
Guest
I was told by a member of the forum in private a number for Haaland’s release clause that is A LOT more than €150M. Let’s say, it’s a number that no club would pay. And for it to even be triggered, there would need club performance numbers met. This member told me I could use the number next week as more should be made public. So in that sense, it is no different than De Ligt’s. Now let’s be clear, of course it’s not every Raiola client that has a release clause, but he would naturally engineer a mechanism to benefit each client specifically in a process of contract renewal. This is different from when Spanish clubs have to design their own release clauses by lawThat's not what I'm talking about, but since we've gone there, DeLigt is not Haaland...there are more than one club who would pay a $150 mil RC in 3 years time for Haaland if he wanted out...even $200 mil...PSG refused to grant Verratti a RC...and I have never heard a single mention of a Pogba buyout clause throughout his soap opera of a tenure at MU...my point is simply just because Raiola was his agent it doesn't entail an automatic RC...if City granted him one it means they had to in order to sign him...that may have been the same for anyone I'm sure...personally I don't give a rat's ass if Haaland has one or not...I ecstatic that he signed with us...I was commenting on what I believe is a false narrative, that Raiola = automatic RC...