So that's why we were not interested in Kamara. A lot of our players are not close to 175K a week. These wages are so silly, but unfortunately, this is the price that you are paying when you are taking players for free :(
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
It's Quiet 17 - Glory Thread
- Thread starter tolmie's hairdoo
- Start date
So that's why we were not interested in Kamara. A lot of our players are not close to 175K a week. These wages are so silly, but unfortunately, this is the price that you are paying when you are taking players for free :(
Gaz (FMwkdsoul)
Well-Known Member
Looking at sportrac as a rough estimate we have 19 players accounted for they have 24.It still can’t be true. If it is, their successful period will be short lived.
I still look at the wage bills and how close they are to us, that it can’t be true that their stars aren’t on more.
Our total 142m
There’s 134m
so maybe
These calculations are probably fake IMO. A lot of myths around wages and the same I'm rather skeptical about transfer fees at the Transfermarkt.Looking at sportrac as a rough estimate we have 19 players accounted for they have 24.
Our total 142m
There’s 134m
so maybe
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 60,344
Figures are so different wherever you look.Looking at sportrac as a rough estimate we have 19 players accounted for they have 24.
Our total 142m
There’s 134m
so maybe
Fair play if they get their players to play without increasing their salaries.
I’m still sceptical though.
D
D
Deleted member 87819
Guest
So let’s establish that it’s not because he isn’t good enough, as some were arrogantly trying to argue. In fact, it’s the oppositeSo that's why we were not interested in Kamara. A lot of our players are not close to 175K a week. These wages are so silly, but unfortunately, this is the price that you are paying when you are taking players for free :(
Gaz (FMwkdsoul)
Well-Known Member
Yeah me too, Swiss rambles breakdown has them within 20m a year on the wage bill if I remember right.Figures are so different wherever you look.
Fair play if they get their players to play without increasing their salaries.
I’m still sceptical though.
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 60,344
Yeah, that’s what I was looking at too.Yeah me too, Swiss rambles breakdown has them within 20m a year on the wage bill if I remember right.
If they aren’t on decent salaries, then it’s no wonder they are hesitating to renew.
Nah, bigger wages than Gundogan's, Bernardo Silva's, Riyad's, Foden's, Rodri's, and other crucial players would be a huge problem for the dressing room. Kamara is a good player, but IMO 100K£ per week would be enough for him. A clever move from his agent to choose Villa.So let’s establish that it’s not because he isn’t good enough, as some were arrogantly trying to argue. In fact, it’s the opposite
D
D
Deleted member 87819
Guest
I don’t think you understood what I meant, which wasn’t contradictory to your postNah, bigger wages than Gundogan's, Bernardo Silva's, Riyad's, Foden's, Rodri's, and other crucial players for us would be a huge problem for a dressing room. He is a good player, but IMO 100K£ per week would be enough for him. A clever move from his agent to choose Villa.
Gaz (FMwkdsoul)
Well-Known Member
neither of you will ever know he could have been deemed too greedy or not up to standard when scouted.I don’t think you understood what I meant, which wasn’t contradictory to your post