It's Quiet 17 - Glory Thread

samuelyeboah said:
far far too low
Click to expand...
Better to get something than nothing and I have a feeling we have his replacement lined up should it go through. We can make up the low offer with selling Ake for an additional £5-10mill :). They are desperate for a prem proven defender
 
dadnlad said:
all you hear when we want to sign anybody is squad places , homegrown quota , champions league squad allownces
chelsea arsenal spurs sign who they want need no questions
Click to expand...

Questions from who?

We maybe dont pay attention to their squads the way do to ours, but they will have the same quotas and rules as us.
Apart from Arsenal who aren't in the CL, although Europa has similar limits.
 
nmc said:
Problem is we are not in a great negotiating position - Turn down £35m and pay £15m in wages etc and lose him for free next summer - not saying we should accept but can’t over play a poor hand.
Click to expand...

I like how quickly we've gone from a minimum of 55m to 35m tops and we are still 'thankful' to get whatever.
 
blue61 said:
Given the fact we have already taken in a lot of Sales, I would keep Raz for anything less than £50m including max 10m in addons, especially to a premier league team
Click to expand...

Spot on. Anything less, it is strengthening a rival for cheal while weakening ourselves. For that fee, worth simply holding onto for a season.
 
If Stones could actually stay fit I think we could get away with just having Harwood-Bellis as 4th choice. Unfortunately he’s averaged just 19 league starts a season over the last 5 years.
 
Coatigan said:
I like how quickly we've gone from a minimum of 55m to 35m tops and we are still 'thankful' to get whatever.
Click to expand...

it’s the nature of the situation we are in unfortunately- I don’t like it but no one’s going to pay top dollar for a guy they can get for free in 12 months and I’m surprised the player is welcoming the move - he’d get a shed load more cash next summer.
 
nmc said:
Problem is we are not in a great negotiating position - Turn down £35m and pay £15m in wages etc and lose him for free next summer - not saying we should accept but can’t over play a poor hand.
Click to expand...
It's my understanding that we were prepared to let him see out the remaining year on his contract.
Maybe it's out of spite because it's a rival, but i say fuck it, let him stay and play him and see how he gets on playing in the same team as Haaland.
 
nmc said:
it’s the nature of the situation we are in unfortunately- I don’t like it but no one’s going to pay top dollar for a guy they can get for free in 12 months and I’m surprised the player is welcoming the move - he’d get a shed load more cash next summer.
Click to expand...
The player may have his head turned by another team in twelve months and Chelsea lose out on him

Seems the owner wants a statement signing and Raz is his choice

Pay the price or move on
 
nmc said:
it’s the nature of the situation we are in unfortunately- I don’t like it but no one’s going to pay top dollar for a guy they can get for free in 12 months and I’m surprised the player is welcoming the move - he’d get a shed load more cash next summer.
Click to expand...
The deal has to suit us aswell though.
Raheem is under contract, so regardless if he wants to leave, we can still see no if we feel the fee is too low.
 
nmc said:
Problem is we are not in a great negotiating position - Turn down £35m and pay £15m in wages etc and lose him for free next summer - not saying we should accept but can’t over play a poor hand.
Click to expand...
Course we are, the player ‘needs’ out if you listen to the reasoning, and Chelsea are trying to restructure their entire front line after wasting nigh on £300M, they’ve now got the opportunity to sign an England international in his prime for £50-60M which is a great deal for them
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top