Grealish going forward will be more valuable than Sterling...we can revisit this again down the road...
Raheem (27 years old)Its bizarre that people are defending Sterling's lack of quality by using Grealish as their weapon of choice.
The two players are at opposite ends of their City careers,and neither are they remotely alike in terms of style,contribution,or personality - The Cult of Raheem has taken on a new level entirely!
15/16 11g 10a
16/17 10g 20a (1st w/Pep, everyone struggles;))
17/18 23g 17a
18/19 25g 17a (signed his extension Nov. 2018)
19/20 31g 10a
20/21 14g 12a
21/22 14g 7a
Grealish (26 years old)
15/16 3g 2a
16/17 5g 5a
17/18 6g 8a
18/19 6g 8a
19/20 10g 8a
20/21 7g 12a
21/22 5g 3a
G/A are in all competitions. Btw, I saw a post say Raheem’s had 2 good seasons at City and the rest have been average… LOL
My point about the wages was simply to compare what the players had done in their previous couple seasons to earn the big wages they are on because apparently Raheem’s wages are undeserved. If Raheem’s wages are undeserved, so are Jack’s. That was my point. I want nothing but the best for Jack. He’s a blue. I’m not rooting against him. Jack (like Raheem) should look better and improve his output with a center forward. However, you’re right they are not alike in terms of style, contribution, or personality so I don’t expect Jack to be more valuable (on the pitch) than Raheem has been for this club. And that’s perfectly fine.