Trickyblues
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Aug 2021
- Messages
- 2,163
- Team supported
- City
Lol he’s terrible
People here will eventually get used to it. After awhile the “but X from our academy” or “but X on loan” will stopThe report says we want to sign more homegrown prospects for the team
Exactly, branthwaite isn't of a much higher level than TaylorShould trust our own academy more if that is the case. Branthwaite is hardly ready either.
Despite Doyle struggling at Sunderland could fill that role tooExactly, branthwaite isn't of a much higher level than Taylor
Massive
Might be as good as them, but none of them are a good enough replacement for Sterling.Does anybody other than me thinks that harvey barnes of leicester is as good as bowen or raphinha or saka and is a potential replacement for sterling?
Really?Despite Doyle struggling at Sunderland could fill that role too
Valued around 80-100m tho. Perhaps a 50-60m + player deal? Sterling was linked there too a while back.150m RC. I know they like Mahrez though
Yes really. Better than only 4 games in the Premier League (and struggling) and little else inbetween.Really?
If City get 50-90m for Sterling and Jesus, that fee is almost covered. Ferran covered Haaland and Alvarez. Not totally impossible.Leão would be a next level signing. He’s brilliant - he’d be able to replace the directness and speed that we’d lose if Sterling went too.
Didn’t we look at him before he went to Milan too? I’m sure it was one of those where the Portuguese press were saying it was 100% done (in their typical style).
I can’t see it happening, though, purely because of how much he’d cost. That said, I did find it odd how Milan named a price over the weekend.
Why would city loan Th bellis and buy another one like him, just doesn't make sense, these Xtra guys