Even on a free I would pass on the opportunity. He doesn't have long left at the top.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
It's Quiet 18 - Wanna ring the bell?
- Thread starter tolmie's hairdoo
- Start date
christened at st marks
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 5,217
Starting to like the idea of Jack in midfield and getting a winger in, decision needs to be made on Kyle or maybe has been and if we get Gvadiol happy with him and Ake for LB LCB, if we play 3 get Chilwell, need Bellingham but also only improvements not squad fillers, Philips to go and Lavia back would do me, all assuming Laporte, Gundo, Cancelo and Bernie leave
super_city_si
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Dec 2007
- Messages
- 47,319
Kane would work a treat, hed be a perfect false 9 who bags goals too. However, i can only see it being him or haaland and haaland wins every time. I dont see how they both play And i dont think theyd work together.I think it would work especially if we played 3 CB's with 1 inverted FB. Haaland and Kane are both great players but their games are completely different, Haaland looks to run in behind while Kane looks to drop deep into MF. It looks a perfect partnership to me, although I don't see it happening this Summer but if Kane was on a free in 15 months or so I think we'd be all over it.
add Levi will still want £100m for him.
The Stockport Iniesta
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Aug 2008
- Messages
- 9,611
Why would levy want 100M in 15 months when Kane would be on a free? I'm not suggesting City would sign Kane this Summer for stupid money, only saying I think we would be at the table if he was on a free.Kane would work a treat, hed be a perfect false 9 who bags goals too. However, i can only see it being him or haaland and haaland wins every time. I dont see how they both play And i dont think theyd work together.
add Levi will still want £100m for him.
Kane and Haaland couldn't play together?
You wouldn't sign Kane on a free lol.Even on a free I would pass on the opportunity. He doesn't have long left at the top.
6 years younger than Benzema.
5 years younger than Lewandowski
Yet doesn't have long left?
Fucking clueless.
FantasyIreland
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Oct 2008
- Messages
- 64,697
He's a WUM.Why would levy want 100M in 15 months when Kane would be on a free? I'm not suggesting City would sign Kane this Summer for stupid money, only saying I think we would be at the table if he was on a free.
Kane and Haaland couldn't play together?
You wouldn't sign Kane on a free lol.
6 years younger than Benzema.
5 years younger than Lewandowski
Yet doesn't have long left?
Fucking clueless.
super_city_si
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Dec 2007
- Messages
- 47,319
Oh sorry, i thought we were talking this summer. If its on a free in a 15 months then its a different matter. Probably a no brainer in that case.Why would levy want 100M in 15 months when Kane would be on a free? I'm not suggesting City would sign Kane this Summer for stupid money, only saying I think we would be at the table if he was on a free.
Kane and Haaland couldn't play together?
You wouldn't sign Kane on a free lol.
6 years younger than Benzema.
5 years younger than Lewandowski
Yet doesn't have long left?
Fucking clueless.
Tugay One Cup
Well-Known Member
Can’t believe people are conflating’Kane wants to join City’ with ‘City want to sign Kane’
Learn to read ffs
Well forgive me for hoping that seven years of footballing revolution under Pep Guardiola is going to peak with a 44fucking2, featuring two big lads up top and four centre backs across the defence.
tolmie's hairdoo
Well-Known Member
simon23
Well-Known Member
Agents knocking at txixis door en mass??