Becuase not one single club has offered anything like serious money to buy him.Sell him then.. Why should we keep loaning him?
Exactly! Loan deal to fully committed to purchase at the end of the loan term, pay in installments if need be. Then he's officially off the books, savings on his wages, plus we can recognize the sale in our financials.They’ve lifted economic levers again so they can, we know they have the money, so a loan with obligation to buy sorts that.
Barca using Klarna for purchases.I suspect the answer is ffp related but I don't see why anyone would do this rather than just permanent sale now but structure the payments so nothing needed to be paid for a year.
Buy now pay later.
I think this Is City laying down the marker price, not so much for Barca but Al Hilal who might be his only option come the end of the window.Fair dos to city asking for that he is a top quality player thought but I'd be happy with €30m obligation to buy to get him out!
He's one of our highest paid players, on around 250k per week, so getting him off the books is important, much more that moving on Eric who is on half the wages.You would need to speak to those who do the deals, but I suspect that Barca don't have the necessary funds for a transfer atm.
Getting him out of the way with a commitment to buy at a later stage is what we might have to settle for.
Not for Maguire!!!!West Ham’s deal for Maguire looks like it’s falling through, £60mill plus Harwood-Bellis would be good all round.
You are Count Dracula and I claim my £5.Boring :-)
I need fresh blood.