Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 61,144
Even if it’s not true, Pep is never going to say that we need to buy someone whatever the cost.I believe I answered your question, but you do you
It’s nonsensical.
Even if it’s not true, Pep is never going to say that we need to buy someone whatever the cost.I believe I answered your question, but you do you
No, I am sorry, I don't agree with what you're saying here.Not really. We replaced Gundogan with Kovacic.
We wanted to buy Bellingham as a long term project. He turned us down. It happens.
We didn’t really want Rice, but might have taken him had he wanted to come here. He didn’t. It happens.
KDB then gets injured for 4 months and things then take a more intense turn.
Paqueta was next. Negotiations on a fee were underway. West Ham stalled a bit and in the meantime, we find out Paqueta is a spot fixer, potentially, and walk away.
We weren’t ready for that bombshell.
We’ll still have names on our list. There’s time left and Txiki and Pep don’t tend to panic.
Trust the process.
Inquiries + money create markets...We lack a risk taker , Gundo & Kev made those passes/crosses which our current squad don’t see imo and was quite evedant on Wednesday, as much as I like Phil & Bernardo they don’t possess that skill and are more ball controllers and don’t lose possession.
Do I know the answer no but we need that person who needs a 1 second glance and puts the ball into a dangerous area.
Being this late into the window I think we will struggle to attain the player we need due to lack of them on the market.
How many mangers do you ever hear come out at the start of the season and say ‘I’m really dissatisfied with this squad’?No, I am sorry, I don't agree with what you're saying here.
a. We didn't "replace gundo with kovacic" (certainly didn't intend to) - In fact, kovacic signed before we knew Gundo was leaving. We fully intended to sign kovacic AND renew gundo.
b. What does it mean "We wanted to buy bellingham as a long term project"? We wanted to buy him for him to be a part of the squad, and he is a midfielder. We wanted a midfielder. He turned us down, it happens, I agreed with that.
c. What do you mean we didn't really want Rice? We bid 90m on him. We CLEARLY did want him, how can you not want something and bid so much of your budget on him?
d. The Paqueta news broke BEFORE KDB's injury, this is incorrect. We clearly wanted paqueta regardless of the status of KDB's injury.
I am not saying "We made errors and it's our fault", I am saying we clearly DID want a midfielder ALL summer. we've chased a LOT of them, regardless of the status of kovacic, and none of them worked out, which is fine.
All I am saying is that if we don't end up signing one (Which again, totally fine) - I just don't want to hear that we are "satisfied with the squad", because whoever was in charge of this summer's transfer window could not have possibly been satisfied with the midfield, and the evidence is the abundant number of midfielders we tried to sign and didn't.
Ugh, I apologise for making you write that.No, I am sorry, I don't agree with what you're saying here.
a. We didn't "replace gundo with kovacic" (certainly didn't intend to) - In fact, kovacic signed before we knew Gundo was leaving. We fully intended to sign kovacic AND renew gundo.
b. What does it mean "We wanted to buy bellingham as a long term project"? We wanted to buy him for him to be a part of the squad, and he is a midfielder. We wanted a midfielder. He turned us down, it happens, I agreed with that.
c. What do you mean we didn't really want Rice? We bid 90m on him. We CLEARLY did want him, how can you not want something and bid so much of your budget on him?
d. The Paqueta news broke BEFORE KDB's injury, this is incorrect. We clearly wanted paqueta regardless of the status of KDB's injury.
I am not saying "We made errors and it's our fault", I am saying we clearly DID want a midfielder ALL summer. we've chased a LOT of them, regardless of the status of kovacic, and none of them worked out, which is fine.
All I am saying is that if we don't end up signing one (Which again, totally fine) - I just don't want to hear that we are "satisfied with the squad", because whoever was in charge of this summer's transfer window could not have possibly been satisfied with the midfield, and the evidence is the abundant number of midfielders we tried to sign and didn't.
Why can’t it be that once we identify a target and the club then sets a fair fee? Few weeks of negotiations and then we either close or walk away if said player becomes too expensive.I expect the club to not bullshit. The reason we don't have replacements is because we failed at finding them. Don't try to sell it to me that actually the squad is good and we have a ton of great options. If we did you wouldn't be frantically searching for a replacement.
I am mostly just referring to the briefs they always make when they fail to land a target. the whole "X can play there", "city are satisfied with the squad", just don't like that! but that's just me lolHow many mangers do you ever hear come out at the start of the season and say ‘I’m really dissatisfied with this squad’?
Have you not noticed that Pep bullshits in press conferences when he’s not happy?I am mostly just referring to the briefs they always make when they fail to land a target. the whole "X can play there", "city are satisfied with the squad", just don't like that! but that's just me lol