These are the kinds claims that annoy me:I would imagine Sterling would get benched (like he has done recently) and Sane would continue to keep his place. You can throw up stats which some people like at times to suit an argument. I can think of many "assists" where he has completely fluffed a shot and luckily someone has tapped home. It classes as an assist without there being one tiny attempt of it being so. We put both on the market tomorrow Sane would get snapped up, Sterling wouldn't. Either way we wont be getting Bale so next year hopefully is another year of these two growing, improving and reaching the next level.
1. No you couldn't think of "many". As "many" of such plays don't exist. Maybe one or two. That still leaves him with about 19 other legitimate goals score off his assits. That still leaves him with about 3 - 4 times the number of assist Sane has.
So let's stop with the half baked attempts at undermining facts. And for what its worth, at least people who use stats actually are using something other than their personal bias or poor attempttake at facts distortion
And this is coming from someone who agrees with you that Sane would probably keep his position and Sterling lose his, if Bale came in. But that would have more to do with preference as to who people think is better rather than who is in fact better impact wise.
If we are going by impact, the answer is more likely Sterling. Even if Sane is currently the darling.