Sancho was not one of our best players.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
It's Quiet thread 14 - 'do one' edition
- Thread starter tolmie's hairdoo
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Sancho was not one of our best players.
Asa's left peg
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 Jun 2010
- Messages
- 4,028
- Location
- Sandbach via Rusholme
- Team supported
- Some team in the CFG
I missed the Rosa signing entirely, 2 Brazilian RBs then.
Yeah, then the african lad from Belgium I think? There were other 17/18 yo too. We seem to be preparing for Brexit.
Oh, he was shit in one game?
Fucking hell, sell the ****.
Maybe, and this is a bit out there, but bear with me, maybe he wasn't great because he'd only started 3 league games going into that December derby and just wasn't quite match sharp? And maybe having Stones mid-mental breakdown and Fernandinho still learning to play CB wasn't the ideal defence to be dropped into?
Just an idea. Probably a lot more likely than saying he can't play the position he's spent 90% of his career in though.
Woah, nice sarcasm mate!
Its almost as if you’re so clever, youre cleverer than us less clever people.
How can I be as clever as you?
If Angelino was good enough for us, he’d have been kept around this season.
We had him for a few years - didnt work for him on loan, sold him.
He then plays a season at psv, plays exceptionally well, buy back.
Finally becomes a first team squad player for pep, is here for 6 months and was let go again.
I’m not saying he’s a bad player. Far from it, every time ive seen him play for RB in that wing back position he’s been one of the best players on the pitch.
But if he was good enough, he would still be our player. He is not good enough to play LB in a 4 for a team like ours. Thats my opinion. It also appears to be peps opinion, so maybe send him your next message.
Tugay One Cup
Well-Known Member
If Angelino was good enough for us, he’d have been kept around this season.
It's never that straight forward though, is it?
Even if you're one of those people who thinks we never make mistakes, there are so many other variables.
He was an outstanding young player that our club did everything to keep, including offering a very lucrative contract.Sancho was not one of our best players.
BringBackSwales
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 33,650
Ok so where were the other offers for Sane? Who were the clubs who offered 100m for him? It was either 50m from the German Rags or nothing in a years time29 years old Hazard with 1 year remain in his contract was sold for +100m
Therefore selling 24 years old Sane for 50m is not great deal at all.
OrigamiNinja
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Oct 2008
- Messages
- 9,687
Woah, nice sarcasm mate!
Its almost as if you’re so clever, youre cleverer than us less clever people.
How can I be as clever as you?
If Angelino was good enough for us, he’d have been kept around this season.
We had him for a few years - didnt work for him on loan, sold him.
He then plays a season at psv, plays exceptionally well, buy back.
Finally becomes a first team squad player for pep, is here for 6 months and was let go again.
I’m not saying he’s a bad player. Far from it, every time ive seen him play for RB in that wing back position he’s been one of the best players on the pitch.
But if he was good enough, he would still be our player. He is not good enough to play LB in a 4 for a team like ours. Thats my opinion. It also appears to be peps opinion, so maybe send him your next message.
I don't know if this is true or not.
Where Angelino is concerned, the only thing I am sure of, is that he has not been given a fair crack of the whip at City. He has never been so bad that he has deserved to be shunted out at the 1st opportunity.
If we are not buying a new LB this Summer, I would bring Angelino back and sell Zinchenko.
It's never that straight forward though, is it?
Even if you're one of those people who thinks we never make mistakes, there are so many other variables.
Its the fit.
Again not saying hes not a good player, and assuming we do sell this summer, he should command a big fee as his abilities deserve it.
But he does not fit our team.
If he did, but he was playing badly he would have been kept (like zinchenko this season).
Lots of variables, if zinchenko not been more versatile positionally than Angelino then may well have been zinchenko who went as Angelino probably offers more in offence.Woah, nice sarcasm mate!
Its almost as if you’re so clever, youre cleverer than us less clever people.
How can I be as clever as you?
If Angelino was good enough for us, he’d have been kept around this season.
We had him for a few years - didnt work for him on loan, sold him.
He then plays a season at psv, plays exceptionally well, buy back.
Finally becomes a first team squad player for pep, is here for 6 months and was let go again.
I’m not saying he’s a bad player. Far from it, every time ive seen him play for RB in that wing back position he’s been one of the best players on the pitch.
But if he was good enough, he would still be our player. He is not good enough to play LB in a 4 for a team like ours. Thats my opinion. It also appears to be peps opinion, so maybe send him your next message.
Not everyone in a top side is a top player, this not good enough for us for a reserve player is a bit crass given where we’ve come from. Just my opinion, not a dig
How is he not a fit for our team. He is an overlapping FB just as Mandy isIts the fit.
Again not saying hes not a good player, and assuming we do sell this summer, he should command a big fee as his abilities deserve it.
But he does not fit our team.
If he did, but he was playing badly he would have been kept (like zinchenko this season).
- Status
- Not open for further replies.