It's Quiet thread 14 - 'do one' edition

[bumbleblue]

Jesus & Kane little & large :)

Yes thats the long and short of it

 

[PrezIke]

Kane is a top striker but he’s a sick note. Multiple serious ankle injuries already and only going to get worse with age.

We have a terrible record in regards to injuries and don’t need another injury prone player specially at that price.

Rather wait for Mbappe. Contract up in 2022, not looking like signing a new one.

We can go head to head with Real for him next summer. PSG will not let him go for free.

The chance of Mbappe coming seems fanciful as much as it pains me to say this. Real Madrid the FAR more likely destination.

 

[oakiecokie]

Levy will want +120m and we won’t entertain that.

Don`t be so negative.We`ve got £45M to play about with from Sane.Add another £75M and the jobs a good `un.

 

[chesterbells]

I'd take Kane over Martinez at those numbers.

Spurs have lost all leverage they once had on Kane. We also know exactly what Pep thinks of Kane?

As we do Pochettino;)

Poch, now there’s a name, I wonder where he’ll end up managing.

 

[Decepticon]

Mourinho was pretty upset that we overturned our UEFA ban. Maybe he was hoping that our ban will not persuade Kane from submitting a transfer request to join City. I'm trying to connect the dots....

 

[supercity88]

Kane has had his injury troubles but has had to carry Spurs and England. He's a world class striker, his record is phenomenal considering Spurs aren't blessed with world class players like we are. We could afford to rest him more than they can, which would ensure he can play for longer and not aggravate his ankle. I can't see it happening, purely because he seems to committed to Spurs despite their lack of success. But it would be a quality signing.

 

[Decepticon]

Kane is a top striker but he’s a sick note. Multiple serious ankle injuries already and only going to get worse with age.

We have a terrible record in regards to injuries and don’t need another injury prone player specially at that price.

Rather wait for Mbappe. Contract up in 2022, not looking like signing a new one.

We can go head to head with Real for him next summer. PSG will not let him go for free.

You're dealing with Qatar Sports Investments here. Not in a million years would they sell us Mbappe, even we offer them 1 billion. The hatred between Qatar and UAE is the most vicious I've ever seen from that region.

 

[tolmie's hairdoo]

No he wouldn’t as he has a 60 odd million release clause next year. Raiola doesn’t have a 40 m cut either- not sure where you got that from. Dortmund wouldn’t agree to sell him for what they paid after developing him they aren’t daft.

You do know Mino has had £15m upfront from Dortmund don't you.

Oh, and another £10m went to Haaland's old man.

The commissions were front loaded and Dortmund will pay Mino another £15m when he is transferred again.

Dortmund paid well over the original £20m buy out clause and the supposed £60m buyout clause next year has also been redrafted.

You're Right, Dortmund aren't that daft - nor to agree a £60m sale when they still owe £15m more to his agent.

 

[simon23]

And of course it could be a new contract for Pep

definitely - forgot that one!

 

[Tugay One Cup]

I would rather we spend double what we would on Kane to bring Haaland in. Not that we ever will but he's special.