Good
goodCity don't value Kane over £100m.
goodCity don't value Kane over £100m.
Rightly so when we being quoted 60m for Silva..City don't value Kane over £100m.
80 maxCity don't value Kane over £100m.
Not an accountant but maybe their income from sales is already programmed for repaying short term loans.What I like about this idea is that, if these players were good enough for the Premier League champions and CL finalists, instead of trying to offload them to us as swaps (and in the process landing us with two sets of wages instead of one), why not just sell the fuckers and use the cash to buy Bernardo.
if they are any good, surely, they could raise a meagre £35m for each of them.
Premier League leader in goals and assists with 3 more years on contract and at peak age will not go that cheaply I'm afraid.80 max
City don't value Kane over £100m.
If they actually want to sign him they best had, otherwise we’re in for another long summer of fucking around and starting the season short.City don't value Kane over £100m.
It is covid year , a hundred million is obscene , we wont pay it imoPremier League leader in goals and assists with 3 more years on contract and at peak age will not go that cheaply I'm afraid.
Maybe not, but then as @tolmie's hairdoo posted I can’t see us going much higher, possibly 90 ish. If we go over £100 think we’d want somebody younger. I wouldn’t be surprised if Kane finds himself stuck at Spurs.Premier League leader in goals and assists with 3 more years on contract and at peak age will not go that cheaply I'm afraid.