It's Quiet Thread 15 - Txiki Blinders

[Centurions]

From the figures I’ve read.
£73m paid by the scum.
Minus the £8m paid by Dortmund = £65m
So 15% is £9.75m
Assuming the figures I’ve read are correct.

Ahh, I forgot that it's probably on any amount over the original fee.

 

[Xhavenjoe]

Kane is number one target, he’s the 2nd best striker in the world.

Who's the best?

 

[mccity]

Who's the best?

Surely Lewandowski, or failing that Rashford.

 

[crazyg]

Surely Lewandowski, or failing that Rashford.

And you were doing so well.....

 

[better dead than red]

Which movie is this from?

Airplane

 

[richards30]

What do you think mate, we’re ”done” or not even close? Just feels like Bernardo has an offer somewhere and is gone as soon as he’s back to training…

Not close for me mate even with our resident ITK’s claims as city will want their number for Bernardo or he stays which will mean no grealish and if Spurs will sell Kane but for only £150m minimum then we won’t do that imo. Would LOVE to be totally wrong as Ahsan and Tolm are both singing from the same hymn sheet but I personally think there would be way more positive noise if things were close.

 

[BringBackSwales]

I just flapped when I heard the news that we're willing to bide our time. Hopefully we have a cut off date for Kane

I just flapped when I heard the news that we're willing to bide our time. Hopefully we have a cut off date for Kane

Fucking hell Fordy I’m at the seaside at the moment and the fucking seagulls diving for little kids ice creams don’t flap as much as you

 

[BringBackSwales]

From the figures I’ve read.
£73m paid by the scum.
Minus the £8m paid by Dortmund = £65m
So 15% is £9.75m
Assuming the figures I’ve read are correct.

If anything the transfer fees actually paid by the scum are higher than those reported by the media, the opposite of ours

 

[Gumzy97]

Who's the best?

Lewandowski

 

[LongsightM13]

From the figures I’ve read.
£73m paid by the scum.
Minus the £8m paid by Dortmund = £65m
So 15% is £9.75m
Assuming the figures I’ve read are correct.

I think the 15% sell-on clause actually related to the entire fee and was not solely restricted to any profit, as had been previously reported.