£9.75m I thought.
Original fee removed.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
It's Quiet Thread 15 - Txiki Blinders
- Thread starter tolmie's hairdoo
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Original fee removed.
Stop it, it's going down faster than Jack Grealish£9.75m I thought.
Original fee removed.
Kane is number one target, he’s the 2nd best striker in the world. I doubt the club want to piss Pep off by not getting a striker in. Like when we didn’t replace Kompany and payed for it. Peps got two years left I’m sure the club are trying desperately to get Peps number one target.
If we do not get a striker we are in a fight for top 4, we won the league last year due to Gundogans incredible goal scoring form can he replicate that again that’s asking a lot. A striker is a must, Kane is the signing to retain the league.
If we do not get a striker we are in a fight for top 4, we won the league last year due to Gundogans incredible goal scoring form can he replicate that again that’s asking a lot. A striker is a must, Kane is the signing to retain the league.
Does it? Why?
If the clubs cannot agree a fee then the deal won't happen in a Covid market just the same as it wouldn't in a pre/post Covid market
transfers have got out of control and the money is just not there in football for most of the clubs
the top clubs will have to cut there cloths or face a barcelona fire sale and reduced wages and big debts
even before covid-19 the transfer window was just about who got the most money or will to put there club in even worst debt ? will the big debt be ever cleared in football by the elite or are we going to let be kept being brushed under the carpet
Still not bad £18m for a player who didn’t want to be here.Stop it, it's going down faster than Jack Grealish
urban genie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 11 May 2008
- Messages
- 32,395
It was 15% was it not? Circa £11million.
Even so 11M as 15% does equate to 73M does it?
Genuinely asking btw too lethargic to work it out ;-)
Barcon
Well-Known Member
I thought it was 13%. No idea what we got.
From the figures I’ve read.Even so 11M as 15% does equate to 73M does it?
Genuinely asking btw too lethargic to work it out ;-)
£73m paid by the scum.
Minus the £8m paid by Dortmund = £65m
So 15% is £9.75m
Assuming the figures I’ve read are correct.
LongsightM13
Well-Known Member
A bad start, however, could turn the atmosphere there even more toxic than it already is.Losing on the first game does not ruin the season.
Remember their final home game of last season, the first with fans for a year? Booed off at both HT and full time, fans grappling with stewards as they tried to get to the directors box. Not that long ago either since Eric Dier was in the crowd willing to fight his own fans.
mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
I remember, but losing the first game of the season to reigning champs, isn't necessarily, a bad start. I suspect most of their fans will be expecting it.A bad start, however, could turn the atmosphere there even more toxic than it already is.
Remember their final home game of last season, the first with fans for a year? Booed off at both HT and full time, fans grappling with stewards as they tried to get to the directors box. Not that long ago either since Eric Dier was in the crowd willing to fight his own fans.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.