You say Kane goes missing in international tournament, didn’t he win the golden boot in the last World Cup?? Also you say injury concerns, KDB has missed more games than Kane in the last few seasons so should we get rid of him?
Also you say injury concerns, KDB has missed more games than Kane in the last few seasons so should we get rid of him?
Paying Messi £50m per year for the next 2 years is the best deal out of them all, if we could get that done.60M for Lewandowski looking better and better every time a new story about Kane comes out. At least he and Pep know each other
I can't believe there are people actually turning their noses up at Harry Kane on here. Lol.
Do not kid yourselves - you'd be rubbing one out furiously if he ever joined us.
Being Aussie,you'd know best.You lot don't half talk some shite.
Id be happy to sign Kane.
Id be happy to sign Kane.
I agree but as both players have 3 years left on their contracts and with the current financial climate, their clubs won't be giving them away, gentleman's agreement or not.In my personal opinion a Kane deal is not going to be easier either so I always though if we have to walk on nails to ge our number 9 why not bleed some for Haaland rather than Kane.
I just can’t keep it up anyway.my fore skin has only just recovered from the 6 times Messi was joining us. I can’t keep up any more
Sorry but you are missing the point.. Kane has been flogged to death by Spurs..KDB has been managed properly..look at the scousers this season,falling apart having played the same 11 for the last 3 years..plus Kane has a persistent problem with his ankle, KDB, has had various unrelated issues. Finally,lets not forget Spurs have played fewer matches than us, have won nothing of late, chalk and cheese.You say Kane goes missing in international tournament, didn’t he win the golden boot in the last World Cup?? Also you say injury concerns, KDB has missed more games than Kane in the last few seasons so should we get rid of him?
I've seen a few people saying this and its really bizarre trying to compare keeping a world class yet injury prone 29 year old, and spending £100-125m on one.
Maybe cos the injury prone 29 yr old is gonna cost the club £91 million in wages on his new 5 year contract maybeI've seen a few people saying this and its really bizarre trying to compare keeping a world class yet injury prone 29 year old, and spending £100-125m on one.
At the moment but as he ages will he still be doing it, big mistake unless we are getting him and going for Haaland next year as well revert to 442Not if that injury prone player can still regularly get 20+ PL goals a season.