FCLB said:
Your position is unclear. You say that your position will come automatically to the conclusion if.
Few lines later, you state I might have a problem with Adu's contract.
The US is not part of the EU but still part of what it is called the first world. The US is usually acclaimed as the poster child for democracy and civil/human rights.
The time to research it?
-copy "freedy adu first professional contract" (two seconds)
-open browser on google (five seconds)
-paste "freddy adu first professional contract" (two seconds)
-click research button, wait for answer (one second)
Read headers.
Ten seconds research, less it took you to write your previous message.
The inclination, it is more understandable as you dont want to repeat your conclusion on a country like the US which would certainly weaken your point of view.
Are you incapable of grasping a simple concept? You brought Freddy Adu up, so YOU tell me about it. As I said, if (I really don't understand what other word I'm meant to use instead of 'if' as I don't know the ins and outs of his case) he was legally binded to a contract he signed as a 13 year old child, then the US is as backwards as France. My position is about as clear cut as it could possibly be.
And I certainly don't view the US as "the poster child for democracy and civil/human rights". In fact, I find the idea laughable. As such, I have absolutely no problem in lambasting the US, as I have done 3 times already now. But apparently I'm still being unclear on the matter.