Jacinda Ardern

...which is why we needed proper leadership; a serious leader with gravitas who the vast majority of the population could respect. Instead we got fucking Johnson.

You make it sound like he’s inherited a throne, he was democratically elected by a majority.
 
You make it sound like he’s inherited a throne, he was democratically elected by a majority.
First off he was democratically elected by 42.4% of the voters. No problem with that; it’s how our system works but it’s not a majority. There’s no suggestion he’s inherited anything, he’s bullshitted his way to the top job aided and abetted by an appallingly weak opposition with an even more unelectable leader.

Secondly, the 42.4% who voted Tory were voting for a buffoon and a liar to be PM, so it’s absolutely no surprise that when a real crisis happens that needs proper leadership and judgment, what we get is a complete fuck up.
 
First off he was democratically elected by 42.4% of the voters. No problem with that; it’s how our system works but it’s not a majority. There’s no suggestion he’s inherited anything, he’s bullshitted his way to the top job aided and abetted by an appallingly weak opposition with an even more unelectable leader.

Secondly, the 42.4% who voted Tory were voting for a buffoon and a liar to be PM, so it’s absolutely no surprise that when a real crisis happens that needs proper leadership and judgment, what we get is a complete fuck up.

But at least Brexit is ‘oven ready’
 
First off he was democratically elected by 42.4% of the voters. No problem with that; it’s how our system works but it’s not a majority. There’s no suggestion he’s inherited anything, he’s bullshitted his way to the top job aided and abetted by an appallingly weak opposition with an even more unelectable leader.

Secondly, the 42.4% who voted Tory were voting for a buffoon and a liar to be PM, so it’s absolutely no surprise that when a real crisis happens that needs proper leadership and judgment, what we get is a complete fuck up.

My post is nothing to do with his character, I’ve got a long list of my own complaints but he was elected by a majority, in very surprised you don’t know what that means when referring to our parliament.

A majority government refers to one or multiple governing parties that hold an absolute majority of seats in legislature. This is as opposed to a minority government, where the largest party in a legislature only has a plurality of seats.
 
My post is nothing to do with his character, I’ve got a long list of my own complaints but he was elected by a majority, in very surprised you don’t know what that means when referring to our parliament.
There is a difference between being elected by a majority and having a majority government.
 
There is a difference between being elected by a majority and having a majority government.

Being elected by a majority is the same thing.

The majority voting for a party is irrelevant in our politics.

Anyway, I just wanted to make the point that he’s there because the people put him there, whether he’s got zero principles or not.

As far as I’m concerned he’s more spineless than May.
 
...which is why we needed proper leadership; a serious leader with gravitas who the vast majority of the population could respect. Instead we got fucking Johnson.

I don't get this attack on Johnson. People are the problem. You can make any law you want but if the people wont follow it then it is useless.
NZ locked down but it was the people who respected it. They haven't had 2,000 turn up to a rave where one died, another 3 were stabbed and a woman raped.
 
I don't get this attack on Johnson. People are the problem. You can make any law you want but if the people wont follow it then it is useless.
NZ locked down but it was the people who respected it. They haven't had 2,000 turn up to a rave where one died, another 3 were stabbed and a woman raped.

Whilst you are right to an extent, the public take their lead from those in charge to a degree. So footballers and the PM's chief adviser flouting the guidance definitely hasn't helped underline the importance of respecting the rules.
 
First off he was democratically elected by 42.4% of the voters. No problem with that; it’s how our system works but it’s not a majority. There’s no suggestion he’s inherited anything, he’s bullshitted his way to the top job aided and abetted by an appallingly weak opposition with an even more unelectable leader.

Secondly, the 42.4% who voted Tory were voting for a buffoon and a liar to be PM, so it’s absolutely no surprise that when a real crisis happens that needs proper leadership and judgment, what we get is a complete fuck up.

It's a majority of constituencies! It's a shite system and those constituencies who do not elect an MP on a majority of votes should be told to fuckin' well vote again until they do! The system is unlikely to change because it suits Labour and Tory parties when they seem to have a run with the voters.
 
I don't get this attack on Johnson. People are the problem. You can make any law you want but if the people wont follow it then it is useless.
NZ locked down but it was the people who respected it. They haven't had 2,000 turn up to a rave where one died, another 3 were stabbed and a woman raped.
Yep, people are the problem, but that is why we need an inspirational leader. The response to a clown in charge will not be the same as the response to someone most people respect. Every single country has a significant proportion of idiots. The best leaders find a way of getting most of them onside. We’ve got Johnson.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.